I've got to bump this. Full disclosure: Chaney is a personal pet peeve.
I'm astonished that a supermajority would be okay with Chaney if the new guy gives him the thumbs up. I thoroughly believe he is sub-standard UT and SEC.
I can understand a toe-the-line with regards to the new HC, but seriously, is Chaney THE MAN in a supermajority eyes?
I will be doing cartwheels when Gruden is announced, but I guarantee you, if he keeps Chaney, it will be my first single-eyebrow-raising moment of the Gruden tenure. Really?