Just So Everyone Knows

#4
#4
:rock:

I'm waiting for more on here to buckle under peer pressure!
 
Last edited:
#5
#5
LOL, honestly I was thinking about getting it but everyone says the online is laggy. That would be the only reason I would get it is to play against you guys. I obviously hate that game and it would only intrigue me if I could play against you guys.
 
#6
#6
It would be the only way I could get revenge for the way you guys hand my ass to me in NCAA.
 
#7
#7
I'm sure the lag will be an non issue in a few days. Any new game seems to have lag for a week or so...
 
#8
#8
ive been thinking of making the switch, but im not sure i want to jettison my 360 and all. I really cant justify looking at $700 in gaming stuff in my living room.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#9
#9
I've had the PS3 since 2 weeks after it came out. I haven't really played it much except for RockBand and Assassin's Creed. I use it mostly for a Blu-Ray player but I wouldn't mind playing games on it again.
 
#11
#11
Yeah I'd have to drive to where ever you are and punch you in the face if you traded a xbox360 for a PS3.
 
#14
#14
Yes - if you want to spend $400 on a system that plays 3-4 good games. Granted they do look beautiful and the ones are excellent... but I'm not paying for that crap. That's almost as bad as people paying $250 for Wii Sports... because that's really the only reason 50% of Wii owners buy one.. it was just supposed to be a demo, lol.

I'm sure I'll eventually buy one - just make better games first.
 
Last edited:
#17
#17
Bassmanbruno said:
Yes - if you want to spend $400 on a system that plays 3-4 good games. Granted they do look beautiful and the ones are excellent... but I'm not paying for that crap. That's almost as bad as people paying $250 for Wii Sports... because that's really the only reason 50% of Wii owners buy one.. it was just supposed to be a demo, lol.

I'm sure I'll eventually buy one - just make better games first.
Click to expand...

So its better to pay 300 for a system that may or may not work in a few months, and 50 a year to play online, and 75 for wireless internet, no chance of Hi-def movies, and only 3 or 4 good games...Sounds like a hella great deal.
 
#18
#18
Vol1312 said:
So its better to pay 300 for a system that may or may not work in a few months, and 50 a year to play online, and 75 for wireless internet, no chance of Hi-def movies, and only 3 or 4 good games...Sounds like a hella great deal.
Click to expand...

Only 3-4 good games? Lol.

Luckily bought an xbox after the RR problems so I'm good.

I don't use wireless internet for mine.

I'm not a huge movie guy rental wise.

I'll pay $50 a year for great online stuff over the ps3 mediocrity.

I loved my ps2 though - I played Socom II online 24/7 and it was amazing.
 
#19
#19
Lets see you got gears of war, halo, left 4 dead, and fable. We have little big planet, metal gear, resistance, killzone, warhawk, and god of war. And I have yet to have anyone give me one good thing xboxlive has that psn doesn't. Especially one that makes it worth the fees.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#20
#20
JTrainDavis said:
this coming from one of 2 people ever to play keflings.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

don't hate, keflings is the greatest game EVER! i can't help you couldn't get the hang of it and you were exiled from your own town you built. must suck to be that lame :cray:
 
#21
#21
Vol1312 said:
Lets see you got gears of war, halo, left 4 dead, and fable. We have little big planet, metal gear, resistance, killzone, warhawk, and god of war. And I have yet to have anyone give me one good thing xboxlive has that psn doesn't. Especially one that makes it worth the fees.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

All I can say is Lol if you think those are the only good games and I would never include Halo in there (although millions like it). Have you never owned an xbox? It's common sense.

My brother has both and only uses his for movies, MGS, and Rock Band.
 
#22
#22
enlighten me then. That is the typical response of a 360 fanboy. They thump there chest over superior titles and talk of the sheer awesomeness of xboxlive yet never have any reply that proves anything.
 
#23
#23
you guys really need some sun if youre honestly waging war about the 360/PS3 comparison.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#24
#24
Vol1312 said:
enlighten me then. That is the typical response of a 360 fanboy. They thump there chest over superior titles and talk of the sheer awesomeness of xboxlive yet never have any reply that proves anything.
Click to expand...

And your reply was any different? That's laughable. I have played both systems a lot. I didn't even own an xbox and hated xbox. I was sony all the way - until my brother bought a 360 a few years back and I came home and played his.

I would hardly call myself a fanboy considering I just recently bought my own 360 and its been out so long. And judging by your lingo ("fanboy" - lol) you're one of those raging nerds who gets in arguments with others about 360/ps3 quite often.

I'd say there's a pretty good freakin' reason why the xbox360 is owned by far more people than the ps3 is. Numbers don't lie.
 
Last edited:
#25
#25
The only reason the 360 has sold more is because it was out a year sooner and the majority of owners are kids living at home and having there parents buy them a system. Neilson usage

I have no issues with the 360 as it has some games that I wouldn't mind seeing being ported over I just don't like for people to point out that the 360 is so much better and as usual has no ability to back up there claims.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top