Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#9,552
#9,552
Majors said:
DOJ was years after Bobs initial probe into Epstein. Mueller led FBI had first crack. Those early 2000 FBI probes seem to be getting a free pass.
Click to expand...
Donald Trump and Republicans have the opportunity to do the right thing right now and instead are supporting pedophiles and rapists. I don't give a **** about the early 2000s and neither should you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen, NashVol11 and BernardKingGOAT
#9,553
#9,553
ButchPlz said:
Donald Trump and Republicans have the opportunity to do the right thing right now and instead are supporting pedophiles and rapists. I don't give a **** about the early 2000s and neither should you.
Click to expand...
Early 90’s and 2000’s is when all of transpired with Epstein. So you do or don’t give a ****? Don’t disagree on the opportunity to do the right thing. 3M+ documents, arresting Epstein and getting the Clinton’s in is a start that nobody else chose to do.
 
#9,554
#9,554
Majors said:
Early 90’s and 2000’s is when all of transpired with Epstein. So you do or don’t give a ****? Don’t disagree on the opportunity to do the right thing. 3M+ documents, arresting Epstein and getting the Clinton’s in is a start that nobody else chose to do.
Click to expand...

What’s the line you guys regurgitate on command when Trump’s numerous ties to Epstein get brought up? “If there was anything on Trump it would have been released by now!” Well, Clinton has been around too and two Republican administrations haven’t done anything to him. Personally IDGAF if Clinton goes to jail. Put him in jail for life. I’ve never advocated for his protection.

I do however have a big problem with the sitting president having his DOJ scrub his and his wife’s mentions from the file which were in the thousands and trying to downplay their obvious involvement. Which was entirely predictable. And you MAGA suckers eat it up and will defend him until your dying breath. Enjoy the lasting MAGA legacy of pedophile protection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen, ButchPlz and NashVol11
#9,555
#9,555
VolinMichigan said:
What’s the line you guys regurgitate on command when Trump’s numerous ties to Epstein get brought up? “If there was anything on Trump it would have been released by now!” Well, Clinton has been around too and two Republican administrations haven’t done anything to him. Personally IDGAF if Clinton goes to jail. Put him in jail for life. I’ve never advocated for his protection.

I do however have a big problem with the sitting president having his DOJ scrub his and his wife’s mentions from the file which were in the thousands and trying to downplay their obvious involvement. Which was entirely predictable. And you MAGA suckers eat it up and will defend him until your dying breath. Enjoy the lasting MAGA legacy of pedophile protection.
Click to expand...
I do love the fake rage. I have a problem with everyone before Trump getting a pass, both sides. Really puts the pressure on the left if they get back in power anytime soon.
 
#9,556
#9,556
Majors said:
I do love the fake rage. I have a problem with everyone before Trump getting a pass, both sides. Really puts the pressure on the left if they get back in power anytime soon.
Click to expand...
Who’s saying to give people a pass besides this current admin who is ACTIVELY trying to bury the files and protect the people in them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#9,557
#9,557
VolinMichigan said:
Who’s saying to give people a pass besides this current admin who is ACTIVELY trying to bury the files and protect the people in them?
Click to expand...
The left didn’t care until Trumps name was mentioned. But we agree, I’m all for releasing all of it. Just comical how the left somehow forgot during the Biden years.
 
#9,558
#9,558
Majors said:
The left didn’t care until Trumps name was mentioned. But we agree, I’m all for releasing all of it. Just comical how the left somehow forgot during the Biden years.
Click to expand...
I'm just down to a couple options. The starting point is it is simply inconceivable, as in literally impossible to believe on any level, that Trump was exposed in any of those files and the Dems just decided to let it go. These are people that immediately upon gaining consciousness their first thought is "ORANGE MAN BAD!". (think Everett in Oh Brother, Where Art Thou and "My hair!") That they would pass on ANY opportunity to torpedo Trump is as DOA as anything one could possibly imagine...

unless...

there really isn't nearly as much there as everyone in inferring OR there is something about those files that is so catastrophically radioactive that BOTH SIDES have agreed it's unreleasable. I've no idea what that would actually entail, many have speculated it's international level extortion but I don't know.

There's no defense of anyone in any of the above. In fact I think a top down view devoid of partisanship actually makes for the more interesting conversation. SOMETHING made both parties, seeing the same information, (assuming one isn't in the "there really isn't much to see here" camp) pull back on just releasing all of it up front. The biggest role Trump plays in this top down view is that we KNOW, without even a sub-atomic particle of doubt, the other side would have used information damaging to him in a nanosecond but didn't. Either there's a lot more nothing-burger than what many believe or there's something way bigger than Left vs Right shizz slinging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#9,559
#9,559
hndog609 said:
I'm just down to a couple options. The starting point is it is simply inconceivable, as in literally impossible to believe on any level, that Trump was exposed in any of those files and the Dems just decided to let it go. These are people that immediately upon gaining consciousness their first thought is "ORANGE MAN BAD!". (think Everett in Oh Brother, Where Art Thou and "My hair!") That they would pass on ANY opportunity to torpedo Trump is as DOA as anything one could possibly imagine...

unless...

there really isn't nearly as much there as everyone in inferring OR there is something about those files that is so catastrophically radioactive that BOTH SIDES have agreed it's unreleasable. I've no idea what that would actually entail, many have speculated it's international level extortion but I don't know.

There's no defense of anyone in any of the above. In fact I think a top down view devoid of partisanship actually makes for the more interesting conversation. SOMETHING made both parties, seeing the same information, (assuming one isn't in the "there really isn't much to see here" camp) pull back on just releasing all of it up front. The biggest role Trump plays in this top down view is that we KNOW, without even a sub-atomic particle of doubt, the other side would have used information damaging to him in a nanosecond but didn't. Either there's a lot more nothing-burger than what many believe or there's something way bigger than Left vs Right shizz slinging.
Click to expand...
This is the most logical explanation
 
#9,560
#9,560
Majors said:
I do love the fake rage. I have a problem with everyone before Trump getting a pass, both sides. Really puts the pressure on the left if they get back in power anytime soon.
Click to expand...
The point is there are no “both sides”. There are owners and renters and most likely you’re a renter just like myself and everyone else on this board. Trump works for owners and has to obey or else. Same with Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc. The last president that ran anything was FDR. Everyone is getting a pass because the owners decided that everyone is getting a pass and that’s the end of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ButchPlz
#9,561
#9,561
midnight orange said:
The point is there are no “both sides”. There are owners and renters and most likely you’re a renter just like myself and everyone else on this board. Trump works for owners and has to obey or else. Same with Biden, Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc. The last president that ran anything was FDR. Everyone is getting a pass because the owners decided that everyone is getting a pass and that’s the end of it.
Click to expand...
No, everyone else isn't a renter
 
#9,563
#9,563
midnight orange said:
You’re a renter if you’re subject to the law. Owners in good grace are not.
Click to expand...
I disagree. I recognize the clever, figurative example you're trying to make but I can offer a reality check in another figurative manner. Conducting oneself in a manner where the law is ever a consideration is the ultimate way of life. Developing a strategy that never infringes nor tests the limits of the law is the key. Doing it inconspicuously without thinking about it is a gift
 
#9,564
#9,564
BernardKingGOAT said:
I disagree. I recognize the clever, figurative example you're trying to make but I can offer a reality check in another figurative manner. Conducting oneself in a manner where the law is ever a consideration is the ultimate way of life. Developing a strategy that never infringes nor tests the limits of the law is the key. Doing it inconspicuously without thinking about it is a gift
Click to expand...
I can also offer a reality check. How many people were convicted or even arrested for the billions in fraud or outright criminality from the Wikileaks dump, GFC, Covid or the Epstein list, etc? Maybe I’m looking at it wrong but it seems that there is a class of people that are immune from heinous crimes and fraud. Just because you live within the confines of the law doesn’t mean that everyone else does or has to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and ButchPlz
#9,565
#9,565

Warren Buffett Cuts Ties with friend Bill Gates after Epstein files bombshell and issues Blistering Statement: 'It is astounding'​


Warren Buffett has revealed he has cut off contact with Bill Gates following the explosive release of files linked to Jeffrey Epstein.

The billionaire investor said he has not spoken to the Microsoft co-founder 'at all' since details of Gates' past association with the disgraced financier resurfaced.

'I haven't talked to him at all since the whole thing was unveiled,' Buffett said in an interview on CNBC.


'I don't want to be in a position where I know things… to be called as a witness,' Buffett added.

When asked whether he remained close friends with Gates, Buffett spoke warmly about their longstanding friendship.

However, Buffett added that 'until things are resolved, it's not wise to say much.'

'I'd rather not be under oath,' he said, in his first public remarks about Gates since the Epstein files came to light.

1774983226157.png
'It is astounding to me that anyone could be that successful as a con man,' Buffett said.

'Men are going to like sex... and some of them are going to like not paying taxes, and he figured out their weaknesses,' Buffett said.

'That guy must have been the con man of all time,' Buffett said. 'He had a way of conning everybody.'

Buffett added that Gates might have invited him to New York to meet Epstein, but fortunately never did.


 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top