Tarkus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2012
- Messages
- 1,199
- Likes
- 1,735
Ordinarily, I'd agree 100%, and in fact they've exceeded my expectations as I thought we'd be a 7 win season. Two things bother me. First, we just didn't get better. Not ignoring the lack of talent in some spots, but we just didn't get better as the season went along. Tackling, mistakes, penalties, etc. No team is perfect, but I have to wonder how you don't resolve some of the correctable issues as the season wears on? Then there's the second half of the Vandy game. Knew the replay would be a hard watch and bitter pill, but from the couch, I saw "quit" on that field. That, for me, is the most alarming thing. You can cope with a lack of talent, mistakes, inexperience, but not a lack of heart, desire, pride, and fight.All this drama over an 8-4 (possibly 9-4) season. First world problems.
Its no doubt a crap shoot with any coaching change, but Heupel needs to show a damned pulse and sense of urgency. At least TRY to improve your staff to shore up the glaring weaknesses. At least TRY to use the portal to upgrade your weak spots and establish depth at critical positions. Our team is Charmin soft. Injuries are as predictable as me calling for a loss. This notion that you can't upset kids on the roster by bringing on competition is silly. If that scares 'em off, they don't want to compete and in the second half of the vandy game, we saw that what happens when you have a bunch of those guys on your roster. If Heupel won't do what needs doing, he can portal out with the others. The Vandy game was disgusting.With all of the P4 musical chairs and coaching hires going on right now, for those opining that CHJ has topped out short of the mark at Tennessee, with whom would you replace him?
One caveat, it has to be someone available. No naming someone who just signed a contract elsewhere.
Honestly, at this juncture, I don’t think there’s a coaching upgrade available to UT.
We are who we are. With the exception of 4 seasons in the 90’s and then a couple in early 2000’s, we are a 8-9 win team.What does this have to do with anything?
I don’t get why Garner is sacrosanct on this forum after his unit has underperformed 2 years in a row. Couldn’t finish on the qb last year and couldn’t defend the run this year. His defensive tackles this season were undersized and soft. If his name weren’t Garner, any fanbase would see the issues.I don't want him fired, but he needs a major staff overhaul. There's plenty of other coaches who could win here, but this ain't the year to go looking. It's year 5, we know exactly what we got, what works, and what dosen't. Offense could use some more variations and defensive staff needs a complete overhaul minus Garner.
That's partiality part of the problem is them being undersized, but i think that's becoming the trend. They weren't the best, but they were good enough and still the only bright spot as a unit imo. Always room for improvement, but not as BIG a concern as the other units. LBs have been sorry, as well as safety and corner. Defense has never covered well, but the d line has attacked/ pressured the qb pretty consistently, but it drives me crazy how many ultimately get away.I don’t get why Garner is sacrosanct on this forum after his unit has underperformed 2 years in a row. Couldn’t finish on the qb last year and couldn’t defend the run this year. His defensive tackles this season were undersized and soft. If his name weren’t Garner, any fanbase would see the issues.
Agree. It’s hard to be an effective manager in any business if you aren’t willing to fire poorly performing employees. Comes back to haunt you sooner or later.He needs to resolve that. Leaders must know how to effectively resolve conflict and change.
I have no clue why Josh hesitates.
Navigating work relationships can be difficult. Managing personal relationships can be difficult. Coaches and staff can become family during long hours of a season. It’s. Not easy firing family. The key… keep it biz.
Yep. Nothing like shanking your 2nd best coach in history only to bring in 4 successive coaches that struggled to break .500, if they even did that. Hey you've had two bad seasons in 16. Get the eff out of here. Sure, he had two losing seasons in his last 4. Also, the other two were 9 and 10 win seasons. But, according to VN those aren't good enough either.Well, I was happy he was gone at the time. Two five win seasons in four years is pretty bad for a program with our tradition. I don’t think winning a title ten years previously should have bought him unlimited time to right the ship.
Exactly. Just be a fan if your gonna be one, right? UT don't owe me squat as a fan. I'm just one because I am.We are who we are. With the exception of 4 seasons in the 90’s and then a couple in early 2000’s, we are a 8-9 win team.
There are definitely improvements that could be made. But this idea that we should be a yearly 10-11 win team competing for national championships just isn’t who Tennessee is historically.
Now show the average regular season games played per season for each of those coaches.Does anyone actually know the long tradition of UT football ??!!
We've never had one single coach, not even Neyland himself, that has ever, ever averaged 9 wins or more over their tenure. Not one.
When it comes to average wins per season:
Fulmer - 8.88
CJH - 8.83
Bill Battle - 8.43
Neyland - 8.24
Those are the only 4 UT coaches EVER to clear an 8 game average wins per season over the course of their UT HC career.
Lighten up all you Nancies. Your current coach is #2 all-time thus far by the one SINGLE METRIC any of you care about.
Then we should just sign Heupel to a lifetime contract. No point in trying to punch above our historical average. 8-4 is good enough.We are who we are. With the exception of 4 seasons in the 90’s and then a couple in early 2000’s, we are a 8-9 win team.
There are definitely improvements that could be made. But this idea that we should be a yearly 10-11 win team competing for national championships just isn’t who Tennessee is historically.
