dduncan4163
Have at it Hoss
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2006
- Messages
- 23,396
- Likes
- 51,782
Really worth a listen. Great stuff
I used to be a big believer in that theory, especially after we won the 2001 game, but as time has gone on I'm not sure. Spurrier was simply a better coach than Phil. Spurrier never had a talent advantage over Tennessee in those days; in fact, in some years, Tennessee had more talent. I don't think Tennessee lost a disproportionate share of those games because we had to go to The Swamp in September.That game was played at the end of the year, which is when that game should have always been played. And had it been that way for the past 30 years, I think that changes the entire dynamic of the series. Tennessee NOT having to go to the Swamp in September and Florida having to go to Neyland in November would have really turned things in our favor.
If there's one thing I wish Fulmer would fight the SEC hardest on, it's that.
Agreed and most people outside of Tennessee would agree as well. With the exception of this game and the 1998 game when we had individuals (Al Wilson in 98 and Travis Stephens in 01) put the team on their back and we carried the day, Spurrier’s teams came and played confidently and aggressively and we came out tentative and lost. “Efficiently inefficient” is what one of those guys called it. That’s the hallmark of Fulmer teams.I used to be a big believer in that theory, especially after we won the 2001 game, but as time has gone on I'm not sure. Spurrier was simply a better coach than Phil. Spurrier never had a talent advantage over Tennessee in those days; in fact, in some years, Tennessee had more talent. I don't think Tennessee lost a disproportionate share of those games because we had to go to The Swamp in September.
If anything, playing that game in November every year would have ratcheted up the pressure even more. It was already high to begin with in September, and Spurrier was always better at dealing with pressure than Phil.
Agreed and most people outside of Tennessee would agree as well. With the exception of this game and the 1998 game when we had individuals (Al Wilson in 98 and Travis Stephens in 01) put the team on their back and we carried the day, Spurrier’s teams came and played confidently and aggressively and we came out tentative and lost. “Efficiently inefficient” is what one of those guys called it. That’s the hallmark of Fulmer teams.
I used to be a big believer in that theory, especially after we won the 2001 game, but as time has gone on I'm not sure. Spurrier was simply a better coach than Phil. Spurrier never had a talent advantage over Tennessee in those days; in fact, in some years, Tennessee had more talent. I don't think Tennessee lost a disproportionate share of those games because we had to go to The Swamp in September.
If anything, playing that game in November every year would have ratcheted up the pressure even more. It was already high to begin with in September, and Spurrier was always better at dealing with pressure than Phil.
Those games you mentioned were absolutely not lost on one play; in fact, no game is won or lost on a single play. The Gaffney "catch" occurred on 2nd down and there were 20+ seconds left with the ball inside our 5. 2015 was caused by a complete change in defensive scheme in the 2nd half and Butch not going for 2. And that stuff tends to balance out as well. Tennessee really "shouldn't" have won the 2004 game; the unsportsmanlike flag on Dallas Baker on Florida's final drive was cheap.I'm talking about the entirety of the series. And moving forward.
Florida also won because of some incredible breaks in many games...the Gaffney "catch" (after a bogus 6 man on the LOS call on UT's prior possession kept UT from just icing the clock)...the bogus roughing the passer call in 2006 that kept UT from icing the game on a pick 6 by Morley...the winning FG for Florida in 2014 that should have been a delay of game. Also, the 4th and 14 in 2015 and the hail mary in 2017 were games where a shift in weather advantage would've likely made a one-play difference...and those games were lost on one play. All five of those games I just mentioned were.
It's ridiculous that Tennessee has to go down to Florida in September, but they never have to go to Knoxville, Missouri, or Lexington in November...and UT does have to go to Lexington and Missouri in November. In other words, Tennessee has to go to the most extreme heat and the most extreme cold for road games, whereas Florida never has to be cold and is at home in its own heat.
It's ridiculous that Tennessee has to go down to Florida in September, but they never have to go to Knoxville, Missouri, or Lexington in November...and UT does have to go to Lexington and Missouri in November. In other words, Tennessee has to go to the most extreme heat and the most extreme cold for road games, whereas Florida never has to be cold and is at home in its own heat.
I agree that the timing and location of the games didn’t have much of an impact but you and your gator brothers would be lying if you didn’t acknowledge that Florida has gotten more ‘breaks’ in this series and that Tennessee has handed you guys at least three games on a silver platter. Only the worst coach in our 120+ year history could somehow find a way to lose games that we had a 90% chance of winning in the fourth quarter. A significant number of your wins were more the result of our stupidity more so than you guys simply outplaying us. In recent memory 2014, 2015 and 2017 come to mind. Yes, there were also hard fought games where you DID outplay us but too often we are reminded of our complete meltdowns where we basically said “here Florida, take the ball and win this game”.
Those games you mentioned were absolutely not lost on one play; in fact, no game is won or lost on a single play. The Gaffney "catch" occurred on 2nd down and there were 20+ seconds left with the ball inside our 5. 2015 was caused by a complete change in defensive scheme in the 2nd half and Butch not going for 2. And that stuff tends to balance out as well. Tennessee really "shouldn't" have won the 2004 game; the unsportsmanlike flag on Dallas Baker on Florida's final drive was cheap.
It isn't like Gainesville in September is that much hotter than Knoxville in September anyway. One of the most sweltering environments I've been in my entire life - football game or otherwise - was the 2016 Florida game in Knoxville. If you think Florida would have struggled against us in November because it would have been in the 40s for a bunch of those games...I mean, it would have been cold for our guys too. It isn't like we have a ton of guys from Wisconsin on our team.
About each of those games, ask yourself why we were in a position where so much hinged on "that one play." Hint...it's because the game wasn't won or lost on any one play.Those games absolutely come out differently if one play is changed.
1) The Gaffney game: Tennessee had the ball with a 3rd down and if we get a 1st down, we can ice the clock. Travis Henry runs for a 1st down. Ballgame. But wait...Eric Parker is flagged for being off the LOS, resulting in a penalty, Tennessee is backed up, fails to get the 1st down, and has to punt. Come to find out later, Parker asked the official, "am I good?", official said, "Yes." A different official threw the flag and the "Yes" official failed to overrule him. Change that ONE PLAY, and Tennessee wins. That flag should never have been thrown, but since it was, it should've been picked up.
2) The 4th & 14 game in 2015: obviously, if Tennessee stops that one play, they win.
3) The Hail Mary game in 2017...same.
4) The 2006 game: Florida is down 6 late in the 4th quarter and has to score to win. Dee Morley picks off Leak and returns it for 6, icing the game. But the refs call a roughing the passer on UT because Justin Harrell grazed Leak's helmet trying to block the pass as Leak let it go. Florida gets to keep the ball and ends up scoring. Take away that penalty on that ONE PLAY and Tennessee wins.
5) The winning FG in 2014 was kicked after the play clock expired. If DOG is called, that's a very long FG. It already was.
So yes, all of those games turned on ONE PLAY. And the point is, if a game is close enough to turn on one play, an advantage one way or another in terms of home field or, for the sake of this discussion, weather, would likely change the outcome.
It's just silly that the SEC refuses to make Florida play in the cold.
Those games absolutely come out differently if one play is changed.
1) The Gaffney game: Tennessee had the ball with a 3rd down and if we get a 1st down, we can ice the clock. Travis Henry runs for a 1st down. Ballgame. But wait...Eric Parker is flagged for being off the LOS, resulting in a penalty, Tennessee is backed up, fails to get the 1st down, and has to punt. Come to find out later, Parker asked the official, "am I good?", official said, "Yes." A different official threw the flag and the "Yes" official failed to overrule him. Change that ONE PLAY, and Tennessee wins. That flag should never have been thrown, but since it was, it should've been picked up.
2) The 4th & 14 game in 2015: obviously, if Tennessee stops that one play, they win.
3) The Hail Mary game in 2017...same.
4) The 2006 game: Florida is down 6 late in the 4th quarter and has to score to win. Dee Morley picks off Leak and returns it for 6, icing the game. But the refs call a roughing the passer on UT because Justin Harrell grazed Leak's helmet trying to block the pass as Leak let it go. Florida gets to keep the ball and ends up scoring. Take away that penalty on that ONE PLAY and Tennessee wins.
5) The winning FG in 2014 was kicked after the play clock expired. If DOG is called, that's a very long FG. It already was.
So yes, all of those games turned on ONE PLAY. And the point is, if a game is close enough to turn on one play, an advantage one way or another in terms of home field or, for the sake of this discussion, weather, would likely change the outcome.
It's just silly that the SEC refuses to make Florida play in the cold.
About each of those games, ask yourself why we were in a position where so much hinged on "that one play." Hint...it's because the game wasn't won or lost on any one play.
The 4th & 14 conversion in the 2015 game...I mean come on, it was absolutely ridiculous we were even in that position to begin with. We gave Florida the ball back with a 27-14 lead and just over 10 minutes to play. Florida didn't close that gap on one play or even one offensive series. They came back (I mean, we let them come back) and closed the gap, resulting in a situation where "that one play" mattered. The 2017 Hail Mary game...did you forget Butch's play calling from the one-inch line earlier in that game?
I don't remember all the specific details about every single Florida loss, but I'm sure you can do the same thing in those games too.