...and another one on a third and long when he had to scramble he threw into a lot of coverage, down near your own 20 (don't remember the exact play or point of the game).
Orange played flat and soft as the under belly of a kitten.
Dobbs had no pocket to step up into because Coleman Thomas is barely serviceable and our QB had to run for his life.
Don't get me wrong, Dobbs probably hasn't improved his passing accuracy that much but he didn't have much protection. He didn't run effectively much of the night and made a couple of really bad decisions when throwing the ball - he seriously looked as if he had regressed.
Just a bad night BUT, HEY, look at the bright side...
We won't be saddled like Michigan has been for 9 years with a season opening loss to App State at home being forever shown on ESPN as one of the largest CHOKE JOBS of all times !!!
On the way in this morning was listening to "Full Ride" on XM with Rick Neuheisel and Chris Childers, and of course the game was a topic of conversation. The point that was being argued was that the Vols' offensive scheme is poorly designed when it comes to Dobbs. Dobbs is an athlete, a dual threat. He can throw downfield, but his real strength is that he is always a threat to run. The claim being made was that Dobbs' dual threat ability is underutilized by DeBord.
Personally, my feeling about Dobbs has always been that, while he's a threat to run and capable of making plays downfield, the reality is that he's a bit slow on the decisionmaking when faced with both choices. That is to say, he's fine with either one, if its what is called and the defense is in the right configuration for it to work that time.
If I'm right, the issue is not DeBord. In fact, it may well be that DeBord recognizes Dobbs' limitations, and is trying to manage the decisionmaking for him, from the booth.
If I'm wrong, the issue is indeed the scheme, and DeBord, not surrendering control and putting his faith in Dobbs to make good decisions.
A couple of plays stand out to me that its Dobbs. That wounded duck he threw up at the end of the first half, and another one on a third and long when he had to scramble he threw into a lot of coverage, down near your own 20 (don't remember the exact play or point of the game).
I don't understand why Debord is making him stay in the pocket in a fast pass offense that's designed for the QB to scramble more times than what he did last night,also he's to f$&@&k predictable when it comes to play Calling
The offensive line is most of the problem. I think the better the Oline plays the better the play calling tends to be. That said, however, Thursday night's game was a lot different than the way we played the 2nd half of the season. I expect the staff to insert more plays into the game plan or completely open it up. Saturday will be the true test. Every person who has attended the open portions of practice say this is the best team we've had in a while, that shouldn't change over night, and we shouldn't regress in the offseason. We are gonna have to wait and see. With time dobbs can kill you with his feet, and hit the open passes because of it. The muffed punt and int is highly uncharacteristic for this team.On the way in this morning was listening to "Full Ride" on XM with Rick Neuheisel and Chris Childers, and of course the game was a topic of conversation. The point that was being argued was that the Vols' offensive scheme is poorly designed when it comes to Dobbs. Dobbs is an athlete, a dual threat. He can throw downfield, but his real strength is that he is always a threat to run. The claim being made was that Dobbs' dual threat ability is underutilized by DeBord.
Personally, my feeling about Dobbs has always been that, while he's a threat to run and capable of making plays downfield, the reality is that he's a bit slow on the decisionmaking when faced with both choices. That is to say, he's fine with either one, if its what is called and the defense is in the right configuration for it to work that time.
If I'm right, the issue is not DeBord. In fact, it may well be that DeBord recognizes Dobbs' limitations, and is trying to manage the decisionmaking for him, from the booth.
If I'm wrong, the issue is indeed the scheme, and DeBord, not surrendering control and putting his faith in Dobbs to make good decisions.
A couple of plays stand out to me that its Dobbs. That wounded duck he threw up at the end of the first half, and another one on a third and long when he had to scramble he threw into a lot of coverage, down near your own 20 (don't remember the exact play or point of the game).