rexvol
The Minister of Defense
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2006
- Messages
- 18,124
- Likes
- 54
I'm not going to say that Dooley is going to be
a failure at UT...that remains to be seen. But a
question I have...has Dooley already been "defined." If
one thinks a coach can't be defined this early in his
tenure remember Buzz Peterson.
By the middle of his first year at UT Buzz had already
received the mantle of a hard-luck coach. Remember all
the horrible losses early in his career? The 3-pointers
at Louisville..one off the backboard? Incredible shots
by Georgia...Miss.State...not fouling and giving up
3-pointers against UK and UF UK...fouling and letting
Nebraska get a FOUR-point play to lose a game...on and
on. Peterson was pigeon-holed early...nice guy...looks
good...not the brightest bulb...snake-bit....
Has Dooley already positioned himself? Nice guy...looks
good...maybe in over his head...not attentive to
details...kind of a goofball in interviews. That's
where I think this "Rommel" nonsense may, fairly or
unfairly, harm Dooley. Now the whole thing WAS much ado
about nothing. And the whole PC world we live in is
ridiculous.But it reinforces the view that maybe this
guy isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. Not in
intellect...but in the shark-infested waters of the
SEC...with the Sabans, Meyers and Spurriers...can this
guy avoid getting the "Loser" label?'
this was from an email on:
The Edge on TonyBasilio.com