I'm thinking the Brumbaugh firing goes way deeper than philosophical differences.

[m1al]

Right, but if there was a serious difference in methodology then he should of never been hired.
What the heck did they talk about in the interview?

.. See post #12

 

[GVol1966]

I don't know. I keep hearing he was Ansley's guy and Pruitt went with it.. If true, Pruitt ef'd up not doing his due diligence on the hire...

He seems to a lot

 

[volsack]

Just because Pruitt let Brumbaugh go, doesn't mean he was a bad coach. If there was a serious difference in methodology, then one has to go. It wasn't going to be Pruitt. I think there's way too much being read into the decision to let him go.

4 games into a season? Seems like that would be uncovered in the interview/vetting process

 

[m1al]

4 games into a season? Seems like that would be uncovered in the interview/vetting process

As I said in other posts, it was said that this was Ansley's guy. If true and Pruitt trusted Ansley make the decision, then there probably wasn’t a "formal" interview process. Again, that would still ultimately be on Pruitt for not doing his due diligence...

In the end, we can speculate till the cows come because 99.9% of VolNation has no idea what really happened and probably never will...