... Yes you can. As a supposed "higher tier" team in the SEC, with the lower level teams, there are built-in wins every season. And if you do lose to them, that makes you truly awful. I don't know what to say about Georgia this year.you can't assume UK and Vandy are automatic wins either. There's potential for a 5-7 season.
and if we play like we did on 9-2-06 we could win all of those games.
and that's the problem. which one is the real deal?
Just like the Monday Night Miracle of '05.Let's not forget, too, that we followed the great performance against Cal by a near-miss debacle against AF, then a loss to Meyer (again). After a nice stretch of wins against inferior teams and a tremendous comeback at Georgia (our signature win of the year, IMO), we followed with back-to-back L's against LSU and Arkansas, squeeked by Kentucky, and got embarassed by an unranked team in our New Year's Bowl.
Unfortunately, it seems that our play on 9-2-06 was the exception, not the rule.
You forgot UGA. That would be 6-6
I'm not sure of the cause but I agree with you. UGA finished with a 9-4 record including "embarassing" loses to KY and VU but they have improved through the season and beat three solid football teams in a row to finish things off. That's the kind of "mediocre" season I can accept, a year when you really are young and you build-up your team through the course of a season.Unfortunately we seem to have regressed throughout the year, Ainge's injury notwithstanding.
Maybe the fire under our rear's during the offseason was extinguished after some early season success?
Then turn around and whoop ayse on the rest of the SEC? Who knows. Cal does not play an SEC style game, that game will not be indicitave of the Vols SEC performance.I would like to call that first game against Cal the barometer for the season, but we saw how much that counted this season.
Heaven forbid they actually lose to Cal to kick off 2007...