If We Lose

#2
#2
nope, they worked way too hard and Ainge will get better at it when the UGA's and SC's come around. it makes sense to keep it, when the running game is not poor because of the no huddle, the defense does not suck because of the no huddle....the major problems we have are unrelated to the no huddle.
 
#3
#3
tonyvolsfan05 said:
Do You guys think the no huddle will be out the door.
Click to expand...

The no huddle isn't the problem... but neither has it been a solution, either. We still can't run the ball or pass the ball further than the first down marker.

It says a lot that the most innovative change this staff was able to come up with this offseason is the innocuous "no huddle"...
 
#4
#4
the no-huddle will stay imho. It, in and of itself, isn't the problem. It's the playcalling, which could make better use of the no-huddle, if we could actually run the ball and wear out the defense. As it stands now, if I was an opposing DC, I'd put in personnel to defend against 1-5 yd dinks and eat it alive.

Until they can get a sustained running attack, we won't see the real benefits of the no-huddle.
 
#8
#8
Lose to a little, minor league school like Ark State? That would be the embarrassment of the century for UT. I'll start wearing a bag to games.
 
#9
#9
Rasputin_Vol said:
The no huddle isn't the problem... but neither has it been a solution, either. We still can't run the ball or pass the ball further than the first down marker.

It says a lot that the most innovative change this staff was able to come up with this offseason is the innocuous "no huddle"...
Click to expand...

rasputin talk.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top