S.C. OrangeMan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,970
- Likes
- 1,938
Why isn't it right? There are guidelines in place. The 1887 Interstate Commerce Act and the 1890 Simpson Antitrust Act.I hate that athletes weren’t able to profit in the past. However what we have currently isn’t right either. There needs to be guidelines in place and some of those need to protect student athletes from bad actors like street “agents” and the like.
So nice to read someone using Platonian logic, the fallacy list, and logic these days. Just when I thought critical thinking was dead. I was chastised not long ago by a young person how “all that” was outdated and no longer applicable. I reminded them the principle of how a light switch operates, as well as digitization (0 = off, 1 = on), and machine languages that allowed computers to work at all came directly from the mind of Plato and his system of determining what is true. The new way is just assume it’s true unless it fails then make corrections. It’s how the NYTimes, CNN, and almost every major US media operates these days.You're just throwing words you don't understand together... You are the one that laid down the ultimate false equivalency comparing slavery to the state of college sports. What you did was whats called a straw man argument AKA the Fox News special. It's a very common tactic these days.
A straw man argument is a form of logical fallacy where someone misrepresents their opponent's argument, often by oversimplifying or exaggerating it, and then refutes the misrepresentation rather than the original argument. Essentially, they're arguing against a distorted version of their opponent's position, making it easier to defeat
Its because all this reporting is false.. there is no news its just people going off a Bama fan posting that UT should be kicked from SEC and then the telephone game. If you don't know the Telephone game aka Chinese whispers, google it. It's what a most 'news' these days is.Approving SEC budget now in Donde Plowman's purview as new executive committee president.
If there is any merit to booting TN from the SEC, the SEC is making confusing decisions.
View attachment 745304
You tried to refute logical arguments with a mene clip and speculation???It's a versatile cartoon, what can I say? I was poking fun at the absurd and nonsensical comparisons he was making. The rulings are in place, and more are likely coming down the track at some point as things get hashed out and refined.
You tried to refute logical arguments with a mene clip and speculation???
Bwahahahahaha!
You're denial of reality is noted..Ah, the illustrious clown, S.C. StrawMan, has taken the center ring once again! What new treasures from your "word of the day" calendar will you grace us with now?
To address your question, no. You making absurdly hyperbolic comparisons does not constitute an "argument". You're intelligent and special and everyone should take you super seriously, though.
You're the poster boy of the day for the old saying "Hit dog barks".Ah, the illustrious clown, S.C. StrawMan, has taken the center ring once again! What new treasures from your "word of the day" calendar will you grace us with now?
To address your question, no. You making absurdly hyperbolic comparisons does not constitute an "argument". You're intelligent and special and everyone should take you super seriously, though.
Also SEC and NCAA are stupid to ask Tennessee and Vandy to sign it. You can't make a contract that violates law, it is unenforceable. Both schools could sign it all day but the agreement would get struck down. It is basic contracts 101.
To troll, Tennessee and Vandy should rejoin the Southern Conference and invite Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Virginia, Tulane, Sewanee, and other potential ACC or SEC holdouts to join. It could be 1932 all over again. Heck, let's get 30-40 teams in it. Perhaps reignite the Cumberland University vs Georgia Tech football rivalry.
This - I suspect there are lots of schools that would agree to join up with Tennessee and create a super league that would challenge whatever teams are left in the SEC, B1G et al.
You undermine any valid point you might have by acting like a prick. That's just the reality.Your denial of reality is noted as well.
Sensitive, much?
I realized that and while I am not that old, know the historyPossibly but that was definitely a joke alluding to the fact that the SEC teams were a part of the Southern Conference before joining the SEC in 1933.
You undermine any valid point you might have by acting like a prick. That's just the reality.
Also, the comma isn't necessary — it's not 'Sensitive, pause, much?' It's 'Sensitive much?' as a two-word rhetorical question, unless you're trying to channel William Shatner.
You're just throwing words you don't understand together... You are the one that laid down the ultimate false equivalency comparing slavery to the state of college sports. What you did was whats called a straw man argument AKA the Fox News special. It's a very common tactic these days.
A straw man argument is a form of logical fallacy where someone misrepresents their opponent's argument, often by oversimplifying or exaggerating it, and then refutes the misrepresentation rather than the original argument. Essentially, they're arguing against a distorted version of their opponent's position, making it easier to defeat
Those comparisons are vey factual, as I pointed out item by item.
Your dislike for them does not make them illogical. It just makes it painful and caused the hit dogs to bark.
I realized that and while I am not that old, know the history. I just think that the way this is all going there may eventually be a stepping back to the past to move forward.