norrislakevol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2007
- Messages
- 8,116
- Likes
- 14,205
They're going to lean on their run game. They return most of their OL and some pretty decent RB's. They will test UT's D by pretty much running and running and running. I would have loved to have seen Abanikanda transfer to UT. Looks like a really good young RB.
Honestly, I'm surprised Slovis was named the starter. I thought Patti had a real shot at winning the job. I believe they return 4 or 5 OL's. However their projected starters at WR include Wayne who was their #2 guy last year and two transfers from G-5 schools- Means (La Tech) and Mumpfield (Akron). Mumpfield led Akron in receiving last year. Akron went 2-10 with the MAC's #7 passing O. La Tech went 3-9 with CUSA's #4 passing O. Means was their # 3 receiver. My point is... they have a lot of unknowns at WR and likely a weakness.
Pitt returns a lot of production in their front 7. I believe they only lost one or 2. Their secondary wasn't good last year... then lost its best cover guys. Statistically, Pitt was 12th out of 14 ACC teams vs the pass but first in sacks. That is a bit deceptive since 31 of their 54 sacks came against teams with a losing record. They were stout against the run though most teams appeared to see their pass D weakness and try to take advantage. Even a traditional running school like Mich State had their best passing day of the year vs Pitt.
I think this is a good summary. I fully expect our WR's to be streaking wide open again in their secondary. I heard that the Vols had been working quite a bit on moving the pocket and throwing on the run this fall camp. This will be a good game to test that in.