I believe there is something that we have probably not thought about in the Clausen Vs. Ainge argument.
Our staff has watched both of these kids against OUR first team defense.
OUR DEFENSE!
I can't ever remember Fulmer bragging on a team like he has this one.
They've watched our offense with Ainge and Clausen both under center and they've watched them go against what is likely the quickest and possibly the best defense in the nation, and the offense has gone down field on that great defense.
I believe the coaches came to a conclusion that if Ainge can go long against our defense then he won't have a problem doing it against any defense in the nation.
If his reaction time is ample to see receivers with our front seven on his butt, then he will see them with FL, LSU, and GA's front seven chasing him.
Yes, even the coaches say Clausen can see the field a little better, but if both can see the field against such a great D as we have, then Erik adds the advantage of stretching that great defense a little farther than Rick.
Again, I was pulling for Rick. I guess I always knew it would be Erik though.