SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 54,753
- Likes
- 68,436
That chart doesn't include the defense spending of 2% of GDP correct? That's not part of the common budget. I wanna make sure I understand.
We are far and away, the most developed nation in the world. Have been for a long time. We have the largest and strongest economy in the world. Yes, for a long time. We have the strongest military, and it's not even close, in the world. There were times when others have had a little edge in some specific areas, but we have always persevered with technology and numbers when necessary. It's always been in our best interest to help countries who practice democracy in their form of government. Looking at the geographic makeup of NATO, it's prudent strategically to be the leader of security. Ever heard of the Soviet Union? Do you know why NATO was created?Why?
So none of our 2% goes to any other country correct or is part the allied defense funding controls by NATO?Lol, the 2% of GDP is not for funding NATO, its what NATO members agreed was the target that each member would spend on their own individual defense budgets.
Again, 'reading', and 'reading for comprehension'.
Totally makes sense..I just disagree with it. I don't believe the cost outweighs the benefits. But I respect your reasoning.We are far and away, the most developed nation in the world. Have been for a long time. We have the largest and strongest economy in the world. Yes, for a long time. We have the strongest military, and it's not even close, in the world. There was a time when others have had a little edge in some specific areas, but we have always persevered with technology and numbers when necessary. It's always been in our best interest to help countries who practice democracy in their form of government. Looking at the geographic makeup of NATO, it's prudent strategically to be the leader of security. Ever heard of the Soviet Union? Do you know why NATO was created?
It's not an either/or issue in regards to our resources. What do you think the ratio is of what we spend in our country to what we spend outside of US? We can do both, rather easily. That's our role. We are the super power
So none of our 2% goes to any other country correct or is part the allied defense funding controls by NATO?
Thank you TrumpSince the NATO members agreed on the formula, which was revisited in 2019, it would seem that they disagree with your assessment.
Even the 2% GDP military spending is only just now being taken serious. I think in 2023 only 11 countries met the 2%GDP threshold and around 20 are on track to make it this year.The US used to pay more than 22% of these running costs.
But a new payment formula was agreed in 2019 to address complaints by the Trump administration about the burden to the US of supporting the alliance. How much do Nato members spend on defence?
GNI is adjusted every year for each member nation, the formula itself was last updated in 2019, I'm sure you can find the historical percentages if you use the wayback machine.@BeardedVol The chart you listed on the last page only starts at March of this year and is estimated through December. I don't think it accurately reflects the past 10-20 years.
I'm pretty certain several of those countries only started getting serious about their NATO dues after Putin invaded Ukraine.
Thank you Trump
Even the 2% GDP military spending is only just now being taken serious. I think in 2023 only 11 countries met the 2%GDP threshold and around 20 are on track to make it this year.
I think that is the crux of what @whodeycin85 has been getting at. As I understand it, GDP/GNI on separate tables is what seperates salaries/pensions from the actual armaments. I don't think it is too far fetched to suggest that countries that continual failed to meet their 2% GDP threshold for years are taking our armaments for granted.
I'm attaching a Nato Defense Expenditure PDF (2013 - 2024) if anyone has more time than me to break it down.
What kind of wicked and deceptive chart is this? Defense spending with respect to GDP is a BS statistic.For better or worse, our defense spending levels have nothing to do with how much any other NATO member spends on their own defense, or doesn't.
The cost of maintaining 800 military bases, and 11 carrier groups, etc. aren't affected by Poland increasing defense spending to 4+% of their GDP.
View attachment 659972
That chart isn't helping your case. The US putting in 15% is equal to 15 or so countries combined.The 2% agreement is for defense spending for members armed forces and NATO readiness, not direct NATO common funding, which is separate.
View attachment 659896
You'd know this if you'd read the articles, and learned how NATO actually works.
What kind of wicked and deceptive chart is this? Defense spending with respect to GDP is a BS statistic.
That chart isn't helping your case. The US putting in 15% is equal to 15 or so countries combined.
Seriously? I'll speak slowly for you: When errybody else is only paying 2% or less. If we all pay the same percentage, We are STILL putting more $$ in the coffers...
But you know this... don't you?
These people advocate a global government. Fine. Let's give it to them. They pay their fair share or their defense is up to them. I'll bet they pry open their wallets and find the cash. WE WILL STILL PAY MORE than ANYONE.So you believe that US defence spending is dependent on NATO members meeting their 2% defense spending goals?
You want to show me any evidence whatsoever of this correlation that you believe exists?
Since our NATO allies are at least collectively hitting 2%...
...will we suddenly decrease our defense budget?![]()
NATO’s European Allies Collectively at 2% GDP Defense Spending for 1st Time Ever
Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg says, ‘It is in the national security interest of the United States to have a strong NATO’www.voanews.com
How much will we decrease it by?
Which weapons platforms will we drop or decrease the purchase of?
If Europe spent more of its budget on its own defense, would the US need as many bases in Europe though?For better or worse, our defense spending levels have nothing to do with how much any other NATO member spends on their own defense, or doesn't.
The cost of maintaining 800 military bases, and 11 carrier groups, etc. aren't affected by Poland increasing defense spending to 4+% of their GDP.
View attachment 659972
Why? Would we suddenly not maintain forward staging of our own equipment?If Europe spent more of its budget on its own defense, would the US need as many bases in Europe though?![]()