Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility

#4
#4
Man, talk about some bad titles.

First, the linked article used the title, "Hendon Hooker discusses potential of using extra year of eligibility," which was not at all what he did. In fact, he did the opposite: he declined to discuss it. Entirely.

Then, the OP started this thread with a title that could easily be misunderstood as well, when he wrote, "Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility." That could be interpreted as either Hooker refusing to think about the question, OR Hooker thinking he will not use another year of eligibility. The latter being, of course, also dead wrong.

Folks need to get better at summarizing their thoughts. Lot of misunderstanding when they don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1Volnation, TrapVol, 99grad and 43 others
#5
#5
VFL-82-JP said:
Man, talk about some bad titles.

First, the linked article uses the title, "Hendon Hooker discusses potential of using extra year of eligibility," which is not at all what he did. In fact, he did the opposite: he declined to discuss it. Entirely.

Then, the OP starts this thread with a title that could easily be misunderstood, when he wrote, "Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility," which can be interpreted as either Hooker refusing to think about the question yet, OR Hooker not thinking he'll use another year of eligibility. In other words, thinking he WON'T use an extra year.

Folks need to get better at summarizing their thoughts. Lot of misunderstanding when they don't.
Click to expand...
Clickbait.
The lifeblood of the interweb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dono, HalfullVol, sanglemangle and 12 others
#9
#9
VFL-82-JP said:
Man, talk about some bad titles.

First, the linked article used the title, "Hendon Hooker discusses potential of using extra year of eligibility," which was not at all what he did. In fact, he did the opposite: he declined to discuss it. Entirely.

Then, the OP started this thread with a title that could easily be misunderstood as well, when he wrote, "Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility." That could be interpreted as either Hooker refusing to think about the question, OR Hooker thinking he will not use another year of eligibility. The latter being, of course, also dead wrong.

Folks need to get better at summarizing their thoughts. Lot of misunderstanding when they don't.
Click to expand...

Exactly. OP should prolly edit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFL-82-JP
#11
#11
VFL-82-JP said:
Man, talk about some bad titles.

First, the linked article used the title, "Hendon Hooker discusses potential of using extra year of eligibility," which was not at all what he did. In fact, he did the opposite: he declined to discuss it. Entirely.

Then, the OP started this thread with a title that could easily be misunderstood as well, when he wrote, "Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility." That could be interpreted as either Hooker refusing to think about the question, OR Hooker thinking he will not use another year of eligibility. The latter being, of course, also dead wrong.

Folks need to get better at summarizing their thoughts. Lot of misunderstanding when they don't.
Click to expand...
And while you're at it folks, quit starting these threads with a partial sentence. like: "I tell you what..." or "I believe.." or "We may be 4-4 but.." or "Just asking"
Dang folks, finish the sentence!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sona, SockeyeVol, VFL-82-JP and 1 other person
#17
#17
He needs to do what’s best for him. If he thinks he’s one of the top 100 QBs in the world, wTH, go for it.
 
#18
#18
I would be absolutely stunned if he doesn’t return. He’ll be on everyone’s radar next season if he returns and will make preseason all sec lists etc. He could do wonders for his draft stock by returning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinSmyrna
#19
#19
VFL-82-JP said:
Man, talk about some bad titles.

First, the linked article used the title, "Hendon Hooker discusses potential of using extra year of eligibility," which was not at all what he did. In fact, he did the opposite: he declined to discuss it. Entirely.

Then, the OP started this thread with a title that could easily be misunderstood as well, when he wrote, "Hooker Not Thinking About Using Extra Year of Eligibility." That could be interpreted as either Hooker refusing to think about the question, OR Hooker thinking he will not use another year of eligibility. The latter being, of course, also dead wrong.

Folks need to get better at summarizing their thoughts. Lot of misunderstanding when they don't.
Click to expand...
Exactly,

“Hooker not interested in discussing next season”
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFL-82-JP
#20
#20
I remember getting roasted on here for saying Hooker should be our starter. Especially once Heupel got hired with his offensive system. I compared him to having a Dobbs-esque skill set & got roasted even more. All the Bailey Bros bashing him because he couldn’t keep the starting job at VT. Now everyone is wishing he’d stay another season. Damn it feels good to be right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordVOLdemort
#22
#22
with Hooker, Evans, and Cade Mays (does he have another year?) all back, our 2022 offense would be dynamite.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top