Here's the 2015 Tennessee Men's basketball SEC schedule

#2
#2
Very easy schedule. I think we will be one of the worst teams in the league but 8-10 is possible with that gift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4
#4
I understand that U.T. isn't even going to field a team next year. No use in playing without Maymon, Barton, and MacRae. Better to toss in the towel now and spend the money on football.

With both Stokes and Richardson returning(if it happens)UT could be pushing for an NCAA bid with that easy SEC schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
Hurts the SOS but should help the record. Will need to avoid many bad loss possibilities. the one UK game is at home, imo a golden opportunity we can't afford to miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
It'll even itself out in the long, long run, but I hate how our 2 game opponents have been "West" teams since the expansion and non-divisional play has taken hold.
 
#8
#8
A starting lineup of Richardson, Moore, Stokes, Hubbs, and Thompson could make the tournament and possibly contend for the SEC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#11
#11
I miss the east west divisions. What was wrong with that set up? What jack wagon decided this rotating bs was better?
 
#12
#12
Why do you have to spew negative stuff in every thread?? Isn't your mom telling you to go to bed yet??

It's a good thing when BOP predicts doom and gloom. He has the anti-Midas touch. He made a preseason top 25 poll before Dooley's first season and had UT in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#14
#14
It would certainly be difficult to double team Stokes with that much shooting at the 2-3-4 spots.

Their really isn't any proven shooters in that group. IMO potential maybe but Moore need improvement Hubbs needs to prove it Thompson needs improvement and Rich isn't used to being the guy.

Unrelated to your post Stokes isn't coming back.IMO
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#15
#15
I miss the east west divisions. What was wrong with that set up? What jack wagon decided this rotating bs was better?

It was thought that eliminating divisions would allow the SEC to get more teams in the tourney. Didn't work too well.

As a side note:
The "East" would have been brutal. Top 4 seeds all came from the old East division. The west sucked eggs yet again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
It's why I've been saying for awhile I don't think next year is going to be nearly as bad as many people think record wise. I'm sorry, but next years squad isn't going to become South Carolina over night.

If Stokes returns and we don't have any unexpected departures I think 10+ wins and top 5 in conference is very possible.


Jmo
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
Rebounding and perimeter shooting will be the major issues to deal with this fall. Stokes stock is rising that he has to look at going to the next level. So much has to be looked at during the off season. Will say this, CCM has proven himself to be the man I would want to fix this.
 
#19
#19
It's why I've been saying for awhile I don't think next year is going to be nearly as bad as many people think record wise. I'm sorry, but next years squad isn't going to become South Carolina over night.

If Stokes returns and we don't have any unexpected departures I think 10+ wins and top 5 in conference is very possible.


Jmo

Well, let's keep it real. If Stokes doesn't come back there are some serious things that need to happen. We could become SC overnight if he doesn't come back unless the 4 coming in turn out to be the second coming of the Fab 5(4) or serious, calculated moves are'nt made. This is where a coach really earns his money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Advertisement



Back
Top