1vol8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2019
- Messages
- 7,776
- Likes
- 7,675
I’m not saying I’m right or wrong about what I’d do but given the situation......this is my solution.
If I’m Pruitt I know I’m about to lose 1 of my qbs this off season so I know the importance of getting it right the rest of the way. I know at this point the fans and administration would get on board with developing a young qb for the future.
My first move would be changing the depth chart to read as follows:
Qb1- Bailey OR Maurer
Qb2- Bailey OR Maurer
Qb3- JG
Qb4- Shrout
I tell Cheney to install 14 pass plays for the coming week. 7 for Bailey and 7 for Maurer that suit their respective skill sets. Maurer starts the next game because he’s the upperclassmen. He runs those 7 plays (along with a standard run game) designed for him for the half. No matter the outcome or score the switch is made to Bailey at halftime to run his 7 plays. I don’t read too deep into a good OR bad performance by either but rather use it as teaching moments for film room.
I do the same the following week. Only Bailey starts and Maurer takes over at halftime. Again... I don’t read too deep into the outcome.
At the end of the season, now I evaluate. I have 4 games of tape to evaluate between the two where they were both prepared and drilled vs 4 different opponents. Now it’s about who moved the team? Who made more plays? Who did the team respond to? Who showed a gradual decrease in mistakes? Who showed more ability overall?
Jg is told to move on even if we go 0-4 or 4-0 with the remaining games.
This is the only way I can think of with 4 games remaining that Cheney/Pruitt can ACCURATELY choose who is the best choice going forward.
If I’m Pruitt I know I’m about to lose 1 of my qbs this off season so I know the importance of getting it right the rest of the way. I know at this point the fans and administration would get on board with developing a young qb for the future.
My first move would be changing the depth chart to read as follows:
Qb1- Bailey OR Maurer
Qb2- Bailey OR Maurer
Qb3- JG
Qb4- Shrout
I tell Cheney to install 14 pass plays for the coming week. 7 for Bailey and 7 for Maurer that suit their respective skill sets. Maurer starts the next game because he’s the upperclassmen. He runs those 7 plays (along with a standard run game) designed for him for the half. No matter the outcome or score the switch is made to Bailey at halftime to run his 7 plays. I don’t read too deep into a good OR bad performance by either but rather use it as teaching moments for film room.
I do the same the following week. Only Bailey starts and Maurer takes over at halftime. Again... I don’t read too deep into the outcome.
At the end of the season, now I evaluate. I have 4 games of tape to evaluate between the two where they were both prepared and drilled vs 4 different opponents. Now it’s about who moved the team? Who made more plays? Who did the team respond to? Who showed a gradual decrease in mistakes? Who showed more ability overall?
Jg is told to move on even if we go 0-4 or 4-0 with the remaining games.
This is the only way I can think of with 4 games remaining that Cheney/Pruitt can ACCURATELY choose who is the best choice going forward.