Here’s a breakdown of Miami from SI:
Miami (Ohio) (No. 11 Seed, Midwest Region)
These rankings would be remiss not to include
Miami (Ohio) after its perfect regular season. They’re one of the most difficult teams to evaluate in the field. Miami has run incredibly hot in close games (likely part luck, part skill) and has feasted on a soft schedule, but 31–1 is 31–1. If it were easy to do, we’d see it happen a lot more often. Its reward for that? A First Four matchup with SMU on Wednesday, hoping to play its way into the main draw against Tennessee on Friday.
Beyond the “winning intangibles” angle with Miami, the strongest case for Miami as this year’s Cinderella is its skill level on the offensive end. Shooting forwards Brant Byers and Almar Atlason are major matchup problems that pull bigger defenders away from the rim and open up the floor for drives from star guard Peter Suder. The RedHawks shoot elite percentages from both two and three, rarely turn the ball over, and get to the line at a high clip. To an extent, they’ll need to outscore teams in this tournament to advance, but Miami has the juice on that end of the floor to get hot.
That said, the concern with Miami is that every team they play in this tournament will be by far the best and most talented opponent to date. How will the RedHawks deal with being at a substantial athletic disadvantage against a team in SMU that can really hunt them off the dribble with stud guards like Boopie Miller? Can Miami get much done around the rim with 7-footer Samet Yigitoglu patrolling the paint? And even if Miami can get by the Mustangs, the idea of facing a team with Tennessee’s level of physicality is certainly a disconcerting one.
But even with their flaws, this is obviously not a team you want to see in a close game late. Until the loss to UMass, Miami’s biggest strength had been how clutch they had been in end-of-game situations. Suder in particular has been absolute nails in the clutch. Don’t be surprised to see some March “onions” from him this week.