Gun control debate (merged)

#27,502
#27,502
85SugarVol said:
Well I don’t know what your specific comments were for the poster that said he carried extra ammo in Atlanta.

Did you deem that rational and reasonable?
Click to expand...
I don't think he does, but again, that is coming from someone who will never state what rational or reasonable terms are, but also believes men may one day be able to have babies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88 and 82_VOL_83
#27,504
#27,504
turbovol said:
So we don't really have a gun violence problem in America? That's what you seem to be saying. Don't have a problem with mass shooting and assault rifles--which are obviously used in many if not most mass shootings? All we need is a few more "thoughts and prayers"? Conservatives are always in search of an excuse for gun violence that doesn't involve guns. I'm quite sure the "responsible gun owner" nonsense has been completely debunked. Just in the last two/three weeks, there have been a dozen cases involving completely innocent people shot and killed by crazies with guns---people who mistakenly pulled into the wrong driveway, people who got into the wrong car by mistake, people who asked a neighbor to stop shooting his gun, on and on and on...and yet the crazies think more people should have guns! Sick...insane.
Click to expand...
But by your own admission none of that compares to unarmed invasion of the capital. You have no argument here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#27,505
#27,505
luthervol said:
No. Putting extra ammo in the trunk because you are going to drive thru Atlanta does not seem rational or reasonable.
Click to expand...
Do you view Atlanta as demonstrably different than Memphis?

He made a choice to carry extra ammunition. And then decided to put it in the trunk.

Yea I think I agree with you. That’s a bit irrational.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#27,509
#27,509
K-town Vol Fan said:
Knew it was coming, didn't think it would be the first response, but not surprised nonetheless.
Click to expand...
You are not surprised that appeal to emotion bleatings are met with mockery? Good, you certainly shouldn’t be.

Knew it would get your panties in a wad, didn’t know if you would actually respond, surprised you actually did since you seldom do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiddiedoc and GroverCleveland
#27,511
#27,511
85SugarVol said:
You are not surprised that appeal to emotion bleatings are met with mockery? Good, you certainly shouldn’t be.

Knew it would get your panties in a wad, didn’t know if you would actually respond, surprised you actually did since you seldom do.
Click to expand...
Well if you look at it, 90% of homicides in America are committed by men. This argument actually works in your favor. Why are we talking about guns and blaming guns and not men? Why are women so much more capable of controlling their feelings and emotions? If more women sudden started carrying and picking off pervs and creeps and claiming they were scared for the lives (which would be perfectly legal in most red states) I have a feeling some sort of gun control law would be passed within the year.
 
#27,512
#27,512
K-town Vol Fan said:
Well if you look at it, 90% of homicides in America are committed by men. This argument actually works in your favor. Why are we talking about guns and blaming guns and not men? Why are women so much more capable of controlling their feelings and emotions? If more women sudden started carrying and picking off pervs and creeps and claiming they were scared for the lives (which would be perfectly legal in most red states) I have a feeling some sort of gun control law would be passed within the year.
Click to expand...
You argument is that if women started carrying in greater numbers, leading to an increase of pervs and creeps getting shot, that would lead to unified support for more gun laws?

Lol, ok.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, NurseGoodVol and hog88
#27,513
#27,513
85SugarVol said:
You argument is that if women started carrying in greater numbers, leading to an increase of pervs and creeps getting shot, that would lead to unified support for more gun laws?

Lol, ok.
Click to expand...
By republicans. Because most of the time they are the pervs and creeps.

I get it though, you don't want to have the conversation. Just mock and post whataboutisms. Why I usually don't respond. Not worth my time.
 
#27,514
#27,514
K-town Vol Fan said:
By republicans. Because most of the time they are the pervs and creeps.
Click to expand...
Your argument is that if women started carrying in greater numbers, leading to an increase of pervs and creeps getting shot, that would lead to calls from Republicans for more gun laws?

Lol, ok.
 
#27,517
#27,517
K-town Vol Fan said:
By republicans. Because most of the time they are the pervs and creeps.

I get it though, you don't want to have the conversation. Just mock and post whataboutisms. Why I usually don't respond. Not worth my time.
Click to expand...
You added the second paragraph after the fact.

Where is the whataboutism? Or are just defaulting to throwing out buzz words?

I’m simply amazed that you think more women protecting themselves from harm, with guns, will lead to calls to take away the guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and hog88
#27,519
#27,519
K-town Vol Fan said:
By republicans. Because most of the time they are the pervs and creeps.

I get it though, you don't want to have the conversation. Just mock and post whataboutisms. Why I usually don't respond. Not worth my time.
Click to expand...


As someone who can’t even legally own a gun you have no argument as to who else can. That chic doesn’t have anything to fear.
 
#27,522
#27,522
C-south said:
As someone who can’t even legally own a gun you have no argument as to who else can. That chic doesn’t have anything to fear.
Click to expand...
Actually I can legally own a gun. All I have to do is lie on a piece of paper and there's no one to check me. See the problem?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top