hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 122,379
- Likes
- 181,784
lol.......The states appointed them? You do know those were actually people elected at the state level that did the appointing...right? No matter how you twist and turn, it's always ultimately the people who decide. That's a good thing, it's the only way it can be, I don't know why you guys are so terrified of that reality. Oh wait a second, I do know.
LMFAO! You’re still trying to sell pure Democracy as “society” with your gibberish and you know it’s doomed so you keep up your platitudes with your substitute word for “pure democracy”... and nobody is still buying it. And they won’t.The state is nothing more than a societal sub-group.
Had nothing whatsoever to do with that and it’s been rehashed ad nauseam in this forum. It means exactly what it says, the PEOPLE will retain the means to cast tyranny off of them should it re-emerge in our country.Yes, volunteers were the military and militias, too. They are all professional soldiers now,
Because the average American is dumb. And that means 49% of America is dumber than dumb.lol.......The states appointed them? You do know those were actually people elected at the state level that did the appointing...right? No matter how you twist and turn, it's always ultimately the people who decide. That's a good thing, it's the only way it can be, I don't know why you guys are so terrified of that reality. Oh wait a second, I do know.
An even better argument for why we should access to military arms. An armed citizenry can defend itself against foreign AND domestic threats. The founders weren’t worried about the government finding armed people to fight off invaders. They were worried about the government disarming the citizenry. The citizens had a right to overthrow a government that ignored the constitution, violently if necessary.Yes, volunteers were the military and militias, too. They are all professional soldiers now,
An even better argument for why we should access to military arms. An armed citizenry can defend itself against foreign AND domestic threats. The founders weren’t worried about the government finding armed people to fight off invaders. They were worried about the government disarming the citizenry. The citizens had a right to overthrow a government that ignored the constitution, violently if necessary.
Neither of those are even implied in the language of 1A. You couldn't read that into the 1A. The 2A has very specific language that EVERY gun control law EVER written violates.No one has the religious freedom to sacrifice babies as a ritual.
The press does not have the freedom to produce child pornography.
Society has no rights. Ever. The Constitution applies to individuals and the States and Country that they make up. It doesn't apply to Society. The 1A is a specific set of rights for individuals, not the collective. Same as the 2A.That was the only point I was making. Society's right to restrict rights.
Glad you're back by the way.
Battle of Athens (1946) - WikipediaAn even better argument for why we should access to military arms. An armed citizenry can defend itself against foreign AND domestic threats. The founders weren’t worried about the government finding armed people to fight off invaders. They were worried about the government disarming the citizenry. The citizens had a right to overthrow a government that ignored the constitution, violently if necessary.
Why not Luther? What language in the 2A do you need help with? You can break down the words into their individual definitions (as long as you use the meaning at the time the Constitution was written and not the millennial definitions) and it is very simple.Hilarious. Not even remotely true. I'm thinking this may be one of those points on which we never agree.
