Gun control debate (merged)

#7,689
#7,689
InVOLuntary said:
We have rational and reasonable gun laws. You can make laws to make ownership illegal. Criminals don't follow laws. It's another stupid asserting by stupid people. Are you stupid?
Click to expand...
I asked you if you support rational and reasonable gun laws.
 
#7,690
#7,690
luthervol said:
You tell me, how do we decide what is rational and reasonable?
Click to expand...
We already have them with regards to firearms laws, IMO.

You want more, don't you? What exactly do you want that you don't already have? Will those additional laws that you want prevent all shootings or even any? Where's your proof?

The only way your kind of thinking will effectively halt the use of firearms is to confiscate them all.

Good luck with that.
 
#7,693
#7,693
InVOLuntary said:
And I said we already have reasonable gun laws. I asked you if you were stupid?
Click to expand...
For the most part, no, I'm not stupid; but the fact that I'm engaging in this conversation with you creates some self doubt.
Now that I answered your question, do you have the ability to answer mine?
Do YOU support rational and reasonable gun laws?
Helpful hint: I did not ask if we already have reasonable gun laws.
 
#7,694
#7,694
luthervol said:
For the most part, no, I'm not stupid; but the fact that I'm engaging in this conversation with you creates some self doubt.
Now that I answered your question, do you have the ability to answer mine?
Do YOU support rational and reasonable gun laws?
Helpful hint: I did not ask if we already have reasonable gun laws.
Click to expand...
I've answered you three times. I think the answer to my question is becoming blatantly obvious.
 
#7,695
#7,695
InVOLuntary said:
I've answered you three times. I think the answer to my question is becoming blatantly obvious.
Click to expand...
You didn't answer it once. I know why you refuse, but I thought you might actually man up and say it. I'm constantly overestimating people.
 
#7,696
#7,696
luther, here's a clue:

He doesn't see the need for any more gun laws.

You labeling additional gun prohibitions as "rational and reasonable" is contained within your own mind.
 
#7,697
#7,697
37L1 said:
luther, here's a clue:

He doesn't see the need for any more gun laws.

You labeling additional gun prohibitions as "rational and reasonable" is contained within your own mind.
Click to expand...
I'm more curious as to why he refuses to speak for himself.
So he supports what he considers to be rational and reasonable gun laws but not what others consider to be rational and reasonable?
Feel free to answer for him.
 
#7,698
#7,698
luthervol said:
You didn't answer it once. I know why you refuse, but I thought you might actually man up and say it. I'm constantly overestimating people.
Click to expand...
I answered three times your just too dense to comprehend. I'll put it in bold for you...

WE HAVE ENOUGH GUN LAWS ON OUR BOOKS NOW.

If you feel so strongly, I think you should put a "Gun Free Zone" sign in your front yard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#7,699
#7,699
luthervol said:
You didn't answer it once. I know why you refuse, but I thought you might actually man up and say it. I'm constantly overestimating people.
Click to expand...

Knock off the "Have you stopped beating your wife?" BS. If you want to discuss laws with people regarding firearms then cite them. Otherwise you're just trolling, and blatantly so.
 
#7,700
#7,700
InVOLuntary said:
I answered three times your just too dense to comprehend. I'll put it in bold for you...

WE HAVE ENOUGH GUN LAWS ON OUR BOOKS NOW.

If you feel so strongly, I think you should put a "Gun Free Zone" sign in your front yard.
Click to expand...
lol.......
I'm letting 37L1 speak for you now because you obviously can't answer a direct question.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top