Gun control debate (merged)

#526
#526
Is the silencer considered safer because it doesn't hurt ears? Seems like a stretch of the word safe when talking about guns.
 
#527
#527
Weezy said:
Is the silencer considered safer because it doesn't hurt ears? Seems like a stretch of the word safe when talking about guns.
Click to expand...


Haha, guns are perfectly safe when they're treated with respect and handled properly.

And the answer to your question is yes.
 
#528
#528
Weezy said:
Is the silencer considered safer because it doesn't hurt ears? Seems like a stretch of the word safe when talking about guns.
Click to expand...

It's as good of an argument for allowing common ownership as anyone has for requiring a class 3 for possession.
 
#529
#529
Grand Vol said:
Here a legitimate question LG. I know you pop in here from time to time and probably start muttering in tongues. But let's have a rational question answered from the anti-gun left.

So the National Firearms Act of 1934 (which I know you have no idea what it is, just trust me) made suppressors (silencers) a restricted item as well as putting a $200 federal tax application with an intense background check on same. Now this isn't a firearm, but rather a related item that actually made firearms safer by reducing the noise level from said firearms. However, it's lumped in as a controlled item in this Act.

What justification can anti-gunners continue to use to maintain this item on the NFA 1934 seeing that it actually makes the legal use of firearms safer for all involved by lowering the noise levels? Wouldn't it make more sense to have these items unrestricted, even highly encouraged because of the reduction in noise pollution and safety aspects?

Your answer, please.
Click to expand...

If by "safer" you mean less ear damage caused by noise outweighs making firearms more stealthy, I'm confused by the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#530
#530
lawgator1 said:
If by "safer" you mean less ear damage caused by noise outweighs making firearms more stealthy, I'm confused by the question.
Click to expand...

Less ear damage. And contrary to popular belief, they are not like the movies.

But what you are saying is you think they should be restricted because they might make firearms more stealthy?

Can you give an example of said stealthiness?
 
#531
#531
Grand Vol said:
Less ear damage. And contrary to popular belief, they are not like the movies.

But what you are saying is you think they should be restricted because they might make firearms more stealthy?

Can you give an example of said stealthiness?
Click to expand...

Pfft any shootem up movie. Dang, GV, you don't get out much. Man you can shoot a whole room full of people and they won't even know they are dead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#532
#532
Want to drive a liberal up the wall? Show them this picture...

img_5115-1-jpg.27398


A woman who won't be a victim teaching a child from a young age good habits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#533
#533
Grand Vol said:
Want to drive a liberal up the wall? Show them this picture...

img_5115-1-jpg.27398


A woman who won't be a victim teaching a child from a young age good habits.
Click to expand...

Would like to put my pistol in that mom's holster.
 
#543
#543
CNCVol88 said:
I'm willing to bet that good looking holster is taken care of.
Click to expand...


Assumptions can get you in trouble.

“While you judge me by my outward appearance I am silently doing the same to you, even though there's a ninety-percent chance that in both cases our assumptions are wrong.”
― Richelle E. Goodrich, Smile Anyway: Quotes, Verse, & Grumblings for Every Day of the Year
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#547
#547
hog88 said:
Points in the hotness scale. Hotness is not only physical you know.
Click to expand...

Paradigm changes doesn't it? :)

Of course, I'm not sure some would approve. I mean, having a suppressed SBR that would jump up and kill people stealthily on it's own...well, probably drink a bottle of booze first...would give liberals nightmares.

Stick to the hot ones:

mwvcio-jpg.10279


img_5105-1-jpg.27393


RachelleLeah_bw_gun1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#549
#549
Grand Vol said:
Paradigm changes doesn't it? :)

Of course, I'm not sure some would approve. I mean, having a suppressed SBR that would jump up and kill people stealthily on it's own...well, probably drink a bottle of booze first...would give liberals nightmares.

Stick to the hot ones:

mwvcio-jpg.10279


img_5105-1-jpg.27393


RachelleLeah_bw_gun1.jpg
Click to expand...

If they can cook, I'm in for life.....
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top