they've got one good DT, and very little depth after that. decent LB's and the secondary is kind of a mess.
from a match up standpoint, the only thing i see that halfway scares me at all is the speed they have at WR. and Eason can fling it. Godwin and Mckenzie are legit.
Agree. Two caveats to that.
One, both appear to be pretty undisciplined. They seem to run routes incorrectly or lazy at times. Both have had drops on easy plays.
Two, the direction of this game hinges on how much pressure UT can generate with its down 4 or zone blitzes. Shoop IMO is brilliant so I don't claim any ability to think along with him very far.... but I suspect that UT will play some man over zone and cut the DL loose at times. Anything they can do to disguise their plays or fake blitzes to make Eason think... will only help. Honestly, I think I would try to make him think blitz a lot more than I actually called blitzes.
Eason will throw slants and flat routes based on his pre-snap if there's any pressure at all. There are INT opportunities.
the O line is average at best, and aside from the UNC game, who can't stop anybody, GA hasn't been as effective running the ball as many thought they would, w/or w/out Chubb.
True also. I've watched their games vs MU and Ole Miss a couple of times now trying to figure their OL out. They make mental errors but to a great and surprising degree.... they look like they simply aren't very talented on the OL.
Not because of revenge but UT really should have its way with Kublanow and Wynn. Wynn looks really stiff. Kublanow just flat gets run over some times.
O'Brien and Tuttle have gotten great penetration so there is a GREAT opportunity for UT's DT's to control this game from the start.
The one place UGA has continued to have success in their run game is outside the tackles and particularly their power sweeps. This and taking deep shots until they hit them are the two places I think UGA can do damage.
I would be surprised if they had a 10+ play sustained drive vs UT. Between some talent holes and sporadic issues with execution.... I just don't think that's an option for them right now.
there's absolutely no football reason out there that says we should lose. all the factors affecting the outcome in GA's favor are external, emotional factors, that we can control.
Definitely true. I thought UT had some significant advantages over UF. I think they have more over UGA.
bottom line, it's up to us. it has very little to do with what GA can impose on us. this is a game that we just need to go take. period. if GA wins, it probably means TN helped a lot. and that would suck, and indicate we did in fact have a giant let down....
Football is a funny game played with a ball that often doesn't bounce straight. But once again you're right.
UT needs to:
- avoid turnovers and generate some
- push run plays back inside
- pressure Eason and preferably with the down 4 or a zone blitz to confuse him
- UT needs to run the ball better than they have ytd to get to UGA's lack of depth on D
- Dobbs needs to throw it as well as the 2nd half of UF but from the start
- the biggest factor IMO is penetration and pressure from UT's D. I don't think they can stop UT from moving the ball and do not believe they can move the ball without controlling the LOS better than they have since UNC.
PS- Carolina is a TERRIBLE run D. Three of their 4 opponents have gone over 200 yds on them including FCS James Madison. Illinois who was just limited to 3 yds on 15 attempts by W Michigan had 182 yds and over 5 ypc vs UNC. The Heels allow 4.98 ypc ranking 106th nationally. They're 118th in ypg allowed.
This all makes UGA's performance against them more of an anomaly than a statement about how well UGA is running the ball.