gas lower since Bush in office.

#4
#4
Good thing it's not based on actual intelligence. I'm a Republican but Bush is dumber than a bag of rocks.
 
#5
#5
What is your point?

Actually, facts will show for most of W's eight years, the average price of gas has been much higher than the average price of gas during the Clinton administration. It is lower right now than it was when he took office? So what?
 
#6
#6
If you're dumb enough to think that the damage Bush caused to this nation over the past 8 years is limited to gas prices, then you probably voted for him.
 
#7
#7
Sabanocchio said:
If you're dumb enough to think that the damage Bush caused to this nation over the past 8 years is limited to gas prices, then you probably voted for him.
Click to expand...

Hell, I voted for him and I realize the damage done. I just cannot be convinced that John Kerry would have been a better choice at the time.
 
#8
#8
Sabanocchio said:
If you're dumb enough to think that the damage Bush caused to this nation over the past 8 years is limited to gas prices, then you probably voted for him.
Click to expand...

yeah, he caused a lot of damage didn't he. it sure wasn't the democrats in congress blocking any type of mortgage reform or the dems blocking us to be able to drill our own oil. it sure wasn't the democrats that kept us from hit again by terrorists. keep drinking that flavor-aid and keep watching PMSNBC. sheep
 
#9
#9
truefan said:
What is your point?

Actually, facts will show for most of W's eight years, the average price of gas has been much higher than the average price of gas during the Clinton administration. It is lower right now than it was when he took office? So what?
Click to expand...

there was no world demand during clinton's years, the last 10 years India and china have increase their demand that caused prices to go up. Bush tried to open up drilling but your liberal blocked any attempt to drill. once again, libs should be tried for treason.
 
#10
#10
truefan said:
What is your point?

Actually, facts will show for most of W's eight years, the average price of gas has been much higher than the average price of gas during the Clinton administration. It is lower right now than it was when he took office? So what?
Click to expand...

gee I wonder why??

Maybe because there is less oil today than in the 90's

Also doesnt help that a few billion people in China and India traded in the bikes and donkeys for cars and motorcycles
 
#12
#12
joevol320 said:
yeah, he caused a lot of damage didn't he. it sure wasn't the democrats in congress blocking any type of mortgage reform or the dems blocking us to be able to drill our own oil. it sure wasn't the democrats that kept us from hit again by terrorists. keep drinking that flavor-aid and keep watching PMSNBC. sheep
Click to expand...

Hey Einstein, please don't let facts get in the way of your uninformed blather. The republicans controlled Congress for six of the eight years W was in office
 
#13
#13
OrangeWilly said:
Hell, I voted for him and I realize the damage done. I just cannot be convinced that John Kerry would have been a better choice at the time.
Click to expand...

At least you are capable of admitting your error. Many around here will defend their choice to a dangerous fault.
 
#14
#14
truefan said:
Hey Einstein, please don't let facts get in the way of your uninformed blather. The republicans controlled Congress for six of the eight years W was in office
Click to expand...

i agree, but it was the dems who blocked the chance to drill. if we were able to drill when Bush proposed it, we would have been able to drill our own oil about 3 years ago. i know we had some repubs that joined sides, but it was those socialist dems who initially blocked it. i know you're not going to believe it, maybe you can your exxon brother ceo about it :thumbsup:
 
#15
#15
Sabanocchio said:
At least you are capable of admitting your error. Many around here will defend their choice to a dangerous fault.
Click to expand...

bush was the better choice than kerry, i wonder how many terrorist attacks whe would have had under kerry. i'd say 1 or 2 at least. your boy would have caused the recession to happend about 2 years earlier.
 
#16
#16
joevol320 said:
bush was the better choice than kerry, i wonder how many terrorist attacks whe would have had under kerry. i'd say 1 or 2 at least. your boy would have caused the recession to happend about 2 years earlier.
Click to expand...
I'm glad we have your expert opinion about what would have happened in an alternative reality.
 
#17
#17
joevol320 said:
bush was the better choice than kerry, i wonder how many terrorist attacks whe would have had under kerry. i'd say 1 or 2 at least. your boy would have caused the recession to happend about 2 years earlier.
Click to expand...
Your ignorance on this is clearly available now for the entire board to read.

When you are so biased that you don't allow logic to creep into your way of thinking, you are beyond hope.
 
#18
#18
Sabanocchio said:
Your ignorance on this is clearly available now for the entire board to read.

When you are so biased that you don't allow logic to creep into your way of thinking, you are beyond hope.
Click to expand...

oh as your opinions is full of unbiased brilliance:birgits_giggle:.

what logic are talking about? is blaming Bush your logic? get real.

i agree Bush should been more conservative when it came to spending. under any administration, the freddy and fanny collapse was going to happen because of the democrats protecting any type of investigations.
 
#19
#19
joevol320 said:
oh as your opinions is full of unbiased brilliance:birgits_giggle:.

what logic are talking about? is blaming Bush your logic? get real.

i agree Bush should been more conservative when it came to spending. under any administration, the freddy and fanny collapse was going to happen because of the democrats protecting any type of investigations.
Click to expand...

I have asked you this before but didn't get an answer. What is your level of education?

Sometimes I wonder if your posts are intended to be jokes because YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
 
Last edited:
#20
#20
joevol320 said:
oh as your opinions is full of unbiased brilliance:birgits_giggle:.

what logic are talking about? is blaming Bush your logic? get real.

i agree Bush should been more conservative when it came to spending. under any administration, the freddy and fanny collapse was going to happen because of the democrats protecting any type of investigations.
Click to expand...
If you thought that was going to be the case, then you didn't pay a lot of attention the the guy you voted for. Blaming the democrats for all of your woes is more a more ridiculous assertion than any I have made.

I did my research before I voted. You would have been wise to do the same. Your kind simply picked the guy that you thought best represented your personal views and defended him to a fault. Unfortunately we all had to suffer for your lack of foresight.
 
#22
#22
Sabanocchio said:
At least you are capable of admitting your error. Many around here will defend their choice to a dangerous fault.
Click to expand...

such as? Honestly, while there are lot's of folks that voted for W, most have criticized him and admitted to the many mistakes he made while in office.

I voted for him 2x and he's been a disappointment to be sure. However, I still think he was the better choice compared to Gore and Kerry.
 
#23
#23
Sabanocchio said:
I did my research before I voted. You would have been wise to do the same. Your kind simply picked the guy that you thought best represented your personal views and defended him to a fault. Unfortunately we all had to suffer for your lack of foresight.
Click to expand...

How do you figure? Sounds like your 2 votes cancelled each other out.
 
#24
#24
Sabanocchio said:
If you thought that was going to be the case, then you didn't pay a lot of attention the the guy you voted for. Blaming the democrats for all of your woes is more a more ridiculous assertion than any I have made.

I did my research before I voted. You would have been wise to do the same. Your kind simply picked the guy that you thought best represented your personal views and defended him to a fault. Unfortunately we all had to suffer for your lack of foresight.
Click to expand...

its no difference than blaming Bush for all your problems.

the facts are this, it wasn't Bush who allowed freddy and fannie to make bad loans. it wasn't Bush who blocked any investigation or calls to make changes to freddy and fannie. it was the democrats. i agree that Bush should have been more conservative when it came to spending

as for woes, i don't have any. i'm a conservative. i don't rely on the government, not unlike you liberals who think the government is your only answer.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top