What????? Been said many, many times. Most attempts, esp 3s,is one of the tentpoles of the
Grinnell system.
Fortunately, this was the first part of that system she scrapped. It just took awhile for the players to start playing this way. They did after all break 2 records with the quick chuck system.
I appreciate the discussion, but anyone saying that with no nuance is very misinformed. I think a lot of people are still treating “Grinnell-style volume” and “efficient offense” as if they can’t coexist, and that’s just not how Kim Caldwell actually coaches. It’s important to separate the original Grinnell extremes from the adapted version Caldwell runs. Her goal has never been “shoot bad shots for the sake of shooting.” The goal is more total shot attempts than the opponent, while still hunting shots the staff considers good.
Caldwell has been very consistent on this point.
In a preseason media availability on November 19, 2024, she said: “We want to play fast, but fast doesn’t mean careless. Players still have to know if a shot is a good shot or a bad shot.”
That alone undercuts the idea that she encourages low-quality attempts.
Later, after early-season games where Tennessee’s pace was high but efficiency fluctuated, she said on December 8, 2024: “The pace isn’t the issue. The issue is recognizing which shots we’re supposed to take and which ones we pass up.”
Again, that’s not Grinnell caricature basketball. That’s pace plus selection. What people miss is that shot clock timing matters for efficiency. Taking shots earlier in the possession can actually increase shot quality, not reduce it. Earlier shots are often uncontested or lightly contested, before the defense is fully set. Early decisions reduce turnovers, because you’re not dribbling into traffic late in the clock. You avoid the worst shots in basketball: forced, late-clock heaves taken at 2–3 seconds because nothing developed.
You want a quality shot on every possession, either a close to the basket shot or an open three. She has always said this from day one.
Caldwell addressed this on January 12, 2025, saying: “Late-clock shots are usually bad shots. If we know what we’re looking for, we shouldn’t be waiting until the end of the clock to find it.”
That’s a key philosophical difference from how critics describe her system. The emphasis on early offense isn’t “quick chucking,” it’s decision-making before the possession deteriorates. So no, volume advantage (through turnovers and rebounding) and efficiency aren’t mutually exclusive. You can increase total shot attempts by playing fast, pressing, and rebounding. You can maintain efficiency by defining which quick shots are acceptable and teaching players to recognize them. That’s why her teams can outshoot opponents in raw attempts, set three-point and scoring records, and still talk openly about improving shot selection.
The idea that Caldwell “scrapped efficiency” or “encourages bad shots” just doesn’t line up with what she’s actually said or coached. What she’s doing is closer to modern pace-and-space logic applied aggressively, not a blind copy of Grinnell’s most extreme elements. Fast basketball and smart basketball aren’t opposites. In her system, they’re supposed to reinforce each other.
All of these quotes are from her first season. She hasn't changed the message, but I think she has improved the delivery of the message and the players are starting to buy in and self enforce efficiency this season.