'26 GA SDE Darryl Rivers (Tennessee commit)

#1

HoleInTheRoof

Elite ★★★★★ Poster
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
24,251
Likes
163,081
#1
#2
#2
Interesting offer, especially considering how thiccc our Edge board is already. He picked up a UGA offer last month but hasn't scheduled an OV there yet.
 
#12
#12
Darryl Rivers saw his recruitment go up a level over the spring, and Tennessee was right in the middle of it from the beginning. He is a versatile defender with an impressive 6-4, 270-pound frame and room to grow. In our estimation, the Vols have the momentum here coming out of last weekend after a very productive visit, where he learned plenty more about his football fit and how he could fit in Rodney Garner’s room. We believe a decision is likely early in July, with Mississippi State and Rutgers also involved.

-VQ
 
#13
#13
Darryl Rivers saw his recruitment go up a level over the spring, and Tennessee was right in the middle of it from the beginning. He is a versatile defender with an impressive 6-4, 270-pound frame and room to grow. In our estimation, the Vols have the momentum here coming out of last weekend after a very productive visit, where he learned plenty more about his football fit and how he could fit in Rodney Garner’s room. We believe a decision is likely early in July, with Mississippi State and Rutgers also involved.

-VQ
Why in the bloody ****ing hell isnt our offensive recruiting even half as goodnas defensive?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dansky
#15
#15
Why in the bloody ****ing hell isnt our offensive recruiting even half as goodnas defensive?

What are you basing this question on? Not player rankings I presume.

We have #1 QB. A 5* OT. In the mix for the #1 RB and #1 WR.

If anything, we’re maybe too involved (dependent on who we land) with top end prospects on the offensive side of the ball.
 
#16
#16
What are you basing this question on? Not player rankings I presume.

We have #1 QB. A 5* OT. In the mix for the #1 RB and #1 WR.

If anything, we’re maybe too involved (dependent on who we land) with top end prospects on the offensive side of the ball.
bingo
 
#20
#20
What are you basing this question on? Not player rankings I presume.

We have #1 QB. A 5* OT. In the mix for the #1 RB and #1 WR.

If anything, we’re maybe too involved (dependent on who we land) with top end prospects on the offensive side of the ball.
Yeah but those are facts that don’t fit their desired narrative, so should be ignored.
 

VN Store



Back
Top