'20 GA QB Harrison Bailey (UT SIGNEE)

Maybe they think anyone can run the ball behind a good line.
















No idea, just making ish up at this point....

Pruitt does just refer to making the hole for them and backs just need to fall forward once they're tackled.

Also, we keep shutting down so many great backs. *Maybe he does chalk it up to the lines. I wouldn't agree on that.
But that's all just me not understanding, speculation stuff.
 
Pruitt does just refer to making the hole for them and backs just need to fall forward once they're tackled.

Also, we keep shutting down so many great backs. *Maybe he does chalk it up to the lines. I wouldn't agree on that.
But that's all just me not understanding, speculation stuff.
A great back running behind a great line is how legends are born. A great line makes a mediocre back into a good one, and a great back into a all-time legend
 
Says who?

They're ranked 5th in the CFP.
UGA plays LSU.

Oregon wins the PAC 12 but they lost to Auburn. If Alabama wins out, they'll be in the playoff.

If Ga beats LSU then LSU and Ga both make the playoffs. Oregon isn't even the discussion, Utah is. Ala does not belong in the CFP if they can't even win their own Division. No wsy should a team get in over one loss teams that win their Conference. If Ga beats LSU then they both get in. If LSU beats Ga and Utah and Oklahoma both win their Conference then Utah or OU should get in over Ala. Alabama's schedule is just as horrid as Utah's.

If the committee puts Ala in they are basically saying Conference Championshiip games are meaningless. LSU gets in regardless if they beat Ga or not. But say LSU beats Ga and knocks Ga out of contention and they put Ala in. Basically you punish LSU for beating Ala in Tuscaloosa and you punish Ga for winning the East and both playing an extra game in the SEC Championship. While Ala gets rewarded for their loss to LSU sits at home, rests up and plays one less game than any other playoff team. No argument could ever be fairly made to put Ala in.
 
If Ga beats LSU then LSU and Ga both make the playoffs. Oregon isn't even the discussion, Utah is. Ala does not belong in the CFP if they can't even win their own Division. No wsy should a team get in over one loss teams that win their Conference. If Ga beats LSU then they both get in. If LSU beats Ga and Utah and Oklahoma both win their Conference then Utah or OU should get in over Ala. Alabama's schedule is just as horrid as Utah's.

If the committee puts Ala in they are basically saying Conference Championshiip games are meaningless. LSU gets in regardless if they beat Ga or not. But say LSU beats Ga and knocks Ga out of contention and they put Ala in. Basically you punish LSU for beating Ala in Tuscaloosa and you punish Ga for winning the East and both playing an extra game in the SEC Championship. While Ala gets rewarded for their loss to LSU sits at home, rests up and plays one less game than any other playoff team. No argument could ever be fairly made to put Ala in.
Disagree on the not getting in because you didn't make conference championship. If two teams in a division are two of the best 4 teams at the end of the season, and one team has only lost to the other one they deserve to be in. This year though AL has not looked that great so hopefully they don't get in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: #Vol4Life1991

VN Store



Back
Top