MikeHamiltonFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2009
- Messages
- 6,366
- Likes
- 0
I think Brian Kelly could to well there. Probably not well enough to really contend with Oklahoma or Texas, but maybe occasionally at least meet them in the title game.
To win at Colorado, you have to recruit Texas, California, or a mix of both. Kelly has zero ties either place. He'd be a disaster there.I think Brian Kelly could to well there. Probably not well enough to really contend with Oklahoma or Texas, but maybe occasionally at least meet them in the title game.
I like Kelly. Wouldn't have gone insane if he had been hired at UT. However, if you think he's going to dominate Schiano, Levitt, whoever Pitt hires when they realize Wannstedt is what he is and whoever West Virginia hires when they sober up and fire Stewart at a program that is the sixth most important in its own city, you're just wrong. He's good, he's nowhere near that good.Kelly can write his own ticket at this point. If his dream job doesn't come available, he's more than content to stomp through the Big East and end up in a succession of BCS games.
I named him specifically because I think he can do alright without elite recruiting.
In the Big 12 North, that will leave him losing to Bo Pellini's Nebraska and Gary Pinkel's Missouri nearly every year and, at best, playing Mark Mangino's Kansas even. That'll get you fired in four years at Colorado right now.
I like Kelly. Wouldn't have gone insane if he had been hired at UT. However, if you think he's going to dominate Schiano, Levitt, whoever Pitt hires when they realize Wannstedt is what he is and whoever West Virginia hires when they sober up and fire Stewart at a program that is the sixth most important in its own city, you're just wrong. He's good, he's nowhere near that good.