I actually agree with the wisdom of putting Fulmer on sabbatical for a year after the 2008 season, so can help explain how it might work:
- AD tells Fulmer to take a year off, reflect on the state of the game of football and where he wants the program to go, that as things are working right now it's not going in a positive direction. Tells him the job is his again after the year has passed, if he still wants it, but that he is to have no contact with the football program, the coaching staff, or the players for those 12 months.
- The idea is for Fulmer to have a chance to do two things: rediscover his hunger for excellence, and reflect on ways to improve the program, hire new coaching talent in one or more spots perhaps, get things rolling toward championships again.
- Then the AD calls in Chavis, offers him a one-year head coaching gig, after which time he goes back to being DC. Only thing he's not allowed to do is fire assistant coaches during that year, unless they're doing something illegal/immoral/unethical. It's good for Chavis, good for the program, and keeps a sense of continuity going.
- When, after the year passes, Fulmer comes back as head coach (assuming he does), he has a fresh start to prove his leadership, just as any new coach would. Things don't go well after three or so years, THEN the AD can fire him.
That's a four-year process, 2009 to 2012. I can guaran-damn-tee you we'd do better than 23-27 over those four years, which is what Kiffin and Dooley did for us. AND even if Fulmer were fired after 2012, our AD (Hart by then) would be MUCH better positioned to get a top candidate on board than he was after the Dooley mess. Instead of a Butch Jones, we'd get a James Franklin or a Sonny Dykes, someone on that tier.
And that's if Fulmer isn't back to winning championships with a strong new offensive coordinator.
That's how a sabbatical could work.
"...just doing time trying to get more wins..."
Friend, isn't that what we pay head coaches to do? Get more wins?
EDIT: Econ, I do see your point. I do. You're saying he was coasting. Just 21 wins behind the General for the title of "winningest coach in Tennessee history," and even if it takes him three or four years to get there, he still reaches that goal, so he's coasting. I get it.
Which is where the idea of a sabbatical fits so well. It threatens that goal while giving the man a chance to rediscover his own competitive spirit (and we all know every head coach in college football is ultra-competitive by nature).
Go Vols!