(Duly note I don't condone the Penn St. stuff). I actually didn't want him because he was just an outright bad hire. My feelings on him as a potential HC here had nothing to do with Sandusky stuff in this case. As it pertained to him as HC here, I only cared that I didn't think he would do a good job. Texted multiple Vol fan friends, & none mentioned the Penn St. issue (at least until others brought it up). So, I'm happy we protested. Further, I think the use of Sandusky/Penn St. was just a nice ammunition bullet, something charged up in this PC world, to whip up bad PR, every organization's worst nightmare. UT fans are smart, & cared less about something from 30yrs ago than they did that this would have set us back even more from a coaching standpoint. But, they knew they could use that bit of poison to prevent an otherwise bad mistake. Very savvy. I applaud yall.
Sidenote: I spoke with a guy from the northeast while getting coffee today. From a flaw standpoint, outside of his disaster of a time at TB, he said a major issue with him at Rutgers was a major laxity towards academics. So, one more reason to be glad he's not here.