For you 9/11 conspiracy theorists

#26
#26
But where did they occur? And why bring up conspiracy theorists on WTC if that building was not the issue?

:ermm:
 
#27
#27
Because one of the theories I have heard from them is that the jet fuel fire could not have gotten hot enough to melt steel.
 
#28
#28
CSpindizzy said:
Nope. Different grades. Different items added in for durability. Different thicknesses, densities, etc. Thus different melting points.
Click to expand...

Were mainly talking about rebar steel, not exactly a boutique or specialty grade of steel. And besides, no steel in existence that I know of can withstand 2500-3000 degrees without at least loosing yield strength.
 
#29
#29
Or just dead weight from cracked concrete and melted asphalt? The steel may not have even melted to get this result. Steel rebar in bridge supports only accounts for part of the strength. Concrete also supports that weight but if it is cracked that support is lost and all weight is placed on rebar.
 
#30
#30
Talk about going in circles. First it was - different steel, different grade, blah blah now it is - cracked concrete. Blah blah
 
#32
#32
It's all the same. No matter how much you try to dodge it, the point is that you have two completely different items trying to be compared. So blah blah all you want. You gave bad examples. You didn't take circumstances and reality into consideration. I got your point but the examples were a little off. Next issue...
 
#33
#33
I am not dodging anything, you have gone from "far fetched" to "a little off". "Reality" is, next issue would be best for you to move on to.
 
#34
#34
I'm in reality. I took what actually happened into context. A little off was sarcasm. I will spell it out for you next time.
 
#40
#40
NO ONE that thinks 9-11 was a U.S. Government conspiracy is "taking reality into consideration".
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top