Pete Carroll, Nick Saban, and Bob Stoops.
None of those would be an improvement on Fulmer and then you would have the transition years.
Carroll while having talent level head and shoulders above the rest of the conference, indeed the rest of the country, has this on his resume;
lost to lowly Ore St two of the last three years.
lost last year to a 41 point underdog Stanford.
lost to two conference opponents that last two years in a row and already has one loss this season.
would not be able to recruit the talent to Tennessee he does at So So Cal and probably wouldn't be able to recruit as well as Fulmer even.
Saban would probably have us in trouble with the NCAA within three years. AT least you can count of Fulmer to have his team ready for Louisiana Monroe.
Stoops has lost five of his last six bowl games and he had the edge in talent in all six bowls, is that what you're looking for???
What I'm saying doesn't mean I am taking up for Fulmer btw, I just trying to give some realistic viewpoints.
uke5:
