JohnnyJava
Subversive iconoclast
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,187
- Likes
- 2,328
Why is Stanford cancelling men's and women's fencing, field hockey, lightweight rowing, men's rowing, co-ed and women's sailing, squash, synchronized swimming, men's volleyball and wrestling the tip of the iceberg?
Seriously, I don't get it. Tennessee doesn't field an athletic department supported team in a single one of those. And Stanford had been running a significant deficit in athletics for years. Those sports were likely doomed regardless
Stanford has won the Director's Cup, awarded to the university with the most combined athletic success, a staggering 25 years in a row. They take great pride in that fact. So, they do not take eliminating athletics programs lightly. I didn't verify your info about them running deficits, but I certainly believe you. In fact, very few university athletic departments are sitting on huge surpluses. Ohio State took in 205 million in revenue in a recent year, but had 203 million in expenses. Football and men's basketball are the two money-making sports that all of the money-leaching sports depend on. If universities cannot depend on the influx of media, ticket, and concession monies from football and basketball to fill their coffers, then the non-revenue generating sports are doomed. Going a year without football revenue and a year (plus the 2020 conference and NCAA tournament) of basketball revenue will likely finish off most of these sports. I doubt many of these schools have insurance that will protect them from the lost revenue (nor would it be easy to collect in a timely manner if they did). So, I believe that Stanford doing this, with their proud tradition of success in the non-revenue generating sports, represents the beginning of what we can expect if football and basketball are jeopardized by covid-19.