Florida Democrats Ditching the Democrat Party

[volfanhill]

Not about focus on things like gay rights. I do think the GOP overstated the extent to which gender surgeries actually happen. But the Dems didn't do much to reassure folks it wasn't really a big priority.

Its a judgment thing. For example, if you are pro taxpayers covering the cost of those surgeries for inmates, then you dont have the judgment required to hold any office. Ever

 

[VOLS INC.]

Its a judgment thing. For example, if you are pro taxpayers covering the cost of those surgeries for inmates, then you dont have the judgment required to hold any office. Ever

I think many people have a hard time understanding this concept. Of course Trump and his campaign put a huge magnifying glass over her comments and her position on this topic. Because it demonstrates just how radical she really is.

We were just supposed to pretend like she’s not who we all know her to be.

 

[lawgator1]

Its a judgment thing. For example, if you are pro taxpayers covering the cost of those surgeries for inmates, then you dont have the judgment required to hold any office. Ever

Thats a good example of what I'm talking about. The video ad of Harris on that was extremely effective. Now, in practical terms she was simply following existing law on that subject. But rather than object to it at the time, or explain the backdrop of it, she just let that ad go and offered virtually no response.

In the prior six years only 20 California prisoners had it, from what I read. Hardly a national pandemic, and tiny in the context of the hundreds of thousands of prisoners the state would have had in that time.

But the Harris campaign, eager to appease the ultra far left, didn't minimize it or object as they should have. Just another example of allowing her to be cast a bit unfairly by the opposition.

Thats weak.

 

[volfanhill]

Thats a good example of what I'm talking about. The video ad of Harris on that was extremely effective. Now, in practical terms she was simply following existing law on that subject. But rather than object to it at the time, or explain the backdrop of it, she just let that ad go and offered virtually no response.

In the prior six years only 20 California prisoners had it, from what I read. Hardly a national pandemic, and tiny in the context of the hundreds of thousands of prisoners the state would have had in that time.

But the Harris campaign, eager to appease the ultra far left, didn't minimize it or object as they should have. Just another example of allowing her to be cast a bit unfairly by the opposition.

Thats weak.

She advocated for the law. Immediate disqualification. Doesn't even matter if zero inmates used it. Her judgement was that piss poor.

 

[Orangeburst]

She advocated for the law. Immediate disqualification. Doesn't even matter if zero inmates used it. Her judgement was that piss poor.

You like tea and crumpets?

The correct spelling of the word depends on the type of English being written:

• US English: The correct spelling is "judgment" without the "e". This spelling is preferred in academic writing and is more concise and widely accepted.
  
  
• UK English: The standard spelling is "judgement" with the "e".However, "judgment" is used in legal contexts.