Findings from Report on BPD

#2
#2
Bump

BPD reported such ridiculously low search rates (1.5 percent of pedestrian stops and 0.5 percent of vehicle stops) that the DoJ became suspicious; they decided to recreate the database from scratch using 14,000 paper incident reports.

What they found was remarkable:

During pedestrian stops, officers searched 13 percent of African Americans compared to only 9.5 percent of other people — making African Americans 37 percent more likely to be searched when stopped than other residents.

Similarly, officers were 23 percent more likely to search African Americans during vehicle stops. …

During vehicle stops, BPD officers reported finding some type of contraband less than half as often when searching African Americans — in only 3.9 percent of searches of African Americans, compared to 8.5 percent of other searches.

Search hit rates during pedestrian stops also exhibited large disparities, with officers finding contraband in only 2.6 percent of African American searches compared to 3.9 percent for other searches — a 50 percent difference.

Black people in Baltimore are far, far more likely to be stopped, and they are also more likely to be searched after being stopped — but these searches find contraband 33 to 55 percent less often than searches of people of other races.

This strongly suggests that the “reasonable suspicion” and “probable cause” thresholds for searching African Americans are less reasonable and less probable than those for other people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#3
#3
It's cause darkies commit more crimes that they get stopped more. Or is it that they are caught more cause they are stopped more?

Anyhoo, they're only poor darkies so their constitutional rights don't matter. Each conviction represents one less vote for Hillary, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 people
#7
#7
It's cause darkies commit more crimes that they get stopped more. Or is it that they are caught more cause they are stopped more?

Anyhoo, they're only poor darkies so their constitutional rights don't matter. Each conviction represents one less vote for Hillary, right?

Considering the report mentioned 96% of those stops resulted in no arrest then the first sentence is correct. And that's just fact, it's been fact, not even debatable.

Anyone voting for Hillary should remove themselves from the gene pool immediately. I mean, how can someone actually be so f'n stupid? Seems unreal, but they're out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#9
#9
ever hear of the golden rule? I bet it applies here. Treat others like you want to be treated. Put good in, get good out, etc etc.

going into hyperbole here:

Situation 1: Cop walking down the street says hello, person says hello back. nothing happens.

Situation 2: Cop walking down the street says hello, person says "F off pig", person gets stopped and searched.

Is it more understandable that situation two resulted in a stop & search? (remember hyperbole and no real persons writes were violated just answer the question and this isn't a question about what is appropriate reason for a cop to stop and search someone)

I don't think its a racist thing (skin color) so much as reactionary (even if not justified).

and even after living in Atlanta, Baltimore is a whole different world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12
#12
ever hear of the golden rule? I bet it applies here. Treat others like you want to be treated. Put good in, get good out, etc etc.

going into hyperbole here:

Situation 1: Cop walking down the street says hello, person says hello back. nothing happens.

Situation 2: Cop walking down the street says hello, person says "F off pig", person gets stopped and searched.

Is it more understandable that situation two resulted in a stop & search? (remember hyperbole and no real persons writes were violated just answer the question and this isn't a question about what is appropriate reason for a cop to stop and search someone)

I don't think its a racist thing (skin color) so much as reactionary (even if not justified).

and even after living in Atlanta, Baltimore is a whole different world.

So your argument is that black people get stopped because they say "F off pig"?

Can you back this up with anything other than your inner racist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
#13
#13
So your argument is that black people get stopped because they say "F off pig"?

Can you back this up with anything other than your inner racist?


Could you please just stop with this bull****? People who disagree with you on this....you immediately call racist. Grow up guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 people
#14
#14
Could you please just stop with this bull****? People who disagree with you on this....you immediately call racist. Grow up guy

Seriously? He said something that sounded racist and I can't give him **** for it?

I get called more names than anybody and you have never defended me. GTFO of here with that "grow up" BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
#15
#15
Seriously? He said something that sounded racist and I can't give him **** for it?

I get called more names than anybody and you have never defended me. GTFO of here with that "grow up" BS.

You need me to defend you? Grow up kid :)

There's a big difference between that and calling someone a racist. Being called a racist is hurtful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#16
#16
I didn't actually explicitly call him a racist, I said he had an "inner racist". If he can back up what he said with data, I will not consider it a racist thing to say. If he can't back it up, we gotta chalk that up to prejudice, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#17
#17
It's cause darkies commit more crimes that they get stopped more. Or is it that they are caught more cause they are stopped more?

Anyhoo, they're only poor darkies so their constitutional rights don't matter. Each conviction represents one less vote for Hillary, right?

Darkies?
 
#18
#18
I didn't actually explicitly call him a racist, I said he had an "inner racist". If he can back up what he said with data, I will not consider it a racist thing to say. If he can't back it up, we gotta chalk that up to prejudice, right?

I didn't find anything in his post I would consider racist. Maybe I'm not looking for it as hard as you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
I didn't find anything in his post I would consider racist. Maybe I'm not looking for it as hard as you?
If there is a smidgen, Huff will sniff it out, because he then gets to use the R word. He doesn't get to do it every day, so give him a break. He's excited. He thinks he's on to something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#21
#21
If there is a smidgen, Huff will sniff it out, because he then gets to use the R word. He doesn't get to do it every day, so give him a break. He's excited. He thinks he's on to something.

Bro, you know the last time I said it was weeks ago because you call me out every damn time. What's it been? 4 weeks? 5 weeks? We might as well ban the R word. Every time it's used, people weep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#22
#22
Bro, you know the last time I said it was weeks ago because you call me out every damn time. What's it been? 4 weeks? 5 weeks? We might as well ban the R word. Every time it's used, people weep.
I am here as your conscience. Just keeping an eye on you. LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#23
#23
Bro, you know the last time I said it was weeks ago because you call me out every damn time. What's it been? 4 weeks? 5 weeks? We might as well ban the R word. Every time it's used, people weep.

Tell me about it. People cry at retard all the time.

You're slowly coming around though. You relapsed today with racist, but I personally scent seen you quote reason.com in a bit. You're turning the corner. You're become more diverse. This is good for you and you should be happy at you're improvements despite relapses like today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#24
#24

That breakdown looks bad but its too simple. You would need to group the numbers by police district and then compare with the crime rate. I would think those people stopped in the high crime rate, regardless of color, would be searched more than those in areas of low crime. This would skew those numbers.
 
#25
#25
Some of these are astounding. 1 and 4 are everything that is wrong with modern policing.

https://fee.org/articles/11-incredible-findings-from-the-report-on-baltimore-pd/

6. Police arrested 79 people for “resisting arrest.”

In a throwaway line that somehow says both too much and too little, DoJ mentions that BPD “charged 79 people solely with ‘resisting arrest,’ despite not arresting them for any other crime.”

7. BPD used a police helicopter to arrest people for “playing dice.”

In Baltimore, “playing dice” is illegal. However, DoJ notes, this is the type of minor offense that is enforced “almost exclusively against African Americans.”

Resisting arrest and no other charge. Classic.

Playing dice. Stereotypical activity, but not worthy of arrests or citations.

This is why I say we have too many laws and why I say that cops can have a lot of control over this nonsense if they didn't enforce all of these laws.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

VN Store



Back
Top