To answer you directly, and accurately, I am. And I said it was the vocal minority, not all Tennessee fans, for clarity.if you look at our history as fans and a program, we hold on to football coaches until they completely run us into the ground without any hope of rebuilding within a year or two.
like it or not, it is COMPLETELY possible that this team loses to Florida and Vanderbilt and then loses a bowl game and finishes WITH THE EXACT SAME RECORD as Huepel's first year when the program (by all accounts) was in a complete shambles.
to me it's beginning to smell exactly like 2016 all over again.
I'll leave you with two thoughts.
1. LSU just paid a coach with a .700 record, two back-to-back 10 win seasons and a trip to the SECCG to walk away. Apparently this was so unacceptable that the F#CKING GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA stepped in and said enough is enough and had the AD fired for hiring Kelly to begin with. So pardon me but who TF on this message board is going to come at me saying Tennessee fans are petulant children?? who can say that without losing all credibility? nobody, that's who. the fans of winning programs like Bama and LSU will cry and whine way worse than Tennessee and they will win as a result.
2. Now for the "oh yeah well who would you replace Heupel with" crowd. well I would politely point out that I'm not the one being paid millions of dollars to decide who that is. But I can say that Jimbo Fisher was paid a record amount of money to walk away from TAMU and who did they replace him with? A guy who went 7-5 at Duke and had only 2 years of head coaching experience. And guess who is 8-0 and going to the CFP???
Need a second example? How about Vanderbilt, a team that has for 100 years been in rebuilding mode and has never had a recruiting class anywhere near the worst class UT has ever had, hired a nobody head coach with 0 years of head coaching experience and who will be going to the CFP if they manage to beat UT.
and both of those coaches are doing it in the mighty SEC, not the weak B10 or ACC.
I agree, we are in good shape!No one doubts Heupel’s ability to move the football but coach’s are ultimately judged on wins and losses. Nothing else.
Not dramatically at all.. At the pace Heupel is at, the only thing that would send this program back to 7-5 and 6-6 is our fans trying to prematurely get rid of a young football coach who is adapting by the year. For gods sake just have a little patience. The guy JUST got us out of 25 years of chaos and our fanbase just wants it back again like that. Before him we were in Nebraska territory. Meanwhile the guy STILL has recruiting restrictions from our past horrific coach that our fanbase insisted to hire. Be mad we lost the game, be mad we didn’t execute a game plan that dominated the game, and be mad at whatever else you want. But “taking a risk” and firing a coach that’s AHEAD of schedule coming from where he found us is just idiotic. Like brain dead. Truly.So we should have kept Butch? Is that what you’re saying? We have an actual AD now… he’s improved everything across the board. I’m much more confident in our ability to make a hiring upgrade with Danny White than I was with the Schiano/Pruitt/Fulmer/Currie fiasco. Is it a guarantee? No, nothing is a guarantee, ever. But you have to take some chances in life to improve. I’m not saying we’re there yet with Heupel, but he’s going to need to change dramatically in some different areas and few people are able to do that in their mid 40s in any career. I personally think the writing is on the wall, but I would give him another year at the very least. Either way, we can’t be afraid to make a change when/if that time comes… yeah we might go back to 7-5 or 6-6 type seasons … or we may hire the next “dude” in college football. UT is a top 10 job in the sport, and we need to act like it.
To answer you directly, and accurately, I am. And I said it was the vocal minority, not all Tennessee fans, for clarity.
To point #1. Kelly was fired because he was not engaged and a selfish person who lost the team. He did not embrace the LA culture and made it all about him. If he had any self-awareness he would likely still be their coach but was a bad fit from day one. Second, he was supposed to win it all this year or be in the hunt. The team quite on him so there is a stark contrast to our situation and is an apples to oranges comparison.
3. Vandy? This is a flash in the pan and were destroyed for three quarters by a bad Texas team.
Banks aint off the Hook, its year 5 and his Safeties look more lost now than ever.people keep shaming our defense but by God our offense has lost us 2 games now by being completely inept. you can't blame Banks.
first it's all the dropped passes, my god all the dropped passes right on the hands.
if it's not the dropped passes then our QB throws the ball right to the defense.
if it's not the interceptions then it's missed assignments on the line causing catastrophic fumbles.
if it's not all that then it's our kicker failing to execute in the greatest time of need.
that's all entirely on Heupel's side of the ball.
at least Banks has the excuse that he has had so many good players injured this year.
1. My take is players who left did so for more NIL $ and were not going to get the PT they felt they deserved. Kelly was on the beach during prime recruiting season, no one is defending him and he was toxic for that program. Today's game is simply different and if a kid is going to get more $ and that is his priority he is leaving. It isn't just UT either, plenty of schools are dealing with the same thing. The team plays hard and makes mistakes. Agree if JA doens't come in we would be looking at another couple of losses but if you think Nico being dismissed was on CJH I'd ask you go back and really dig in. The kids dad was a problem and, candidly, even if he stayed we are are in the same boat record wise; he simply wasn't as good as his billing.1. you say Kelly "lost the team" but you clearly step right over all the players that have bolted from UT in the portal including most of our WR corps and our top rated QB last year. Tennessee is only in the position they are in because they were astronomically lucky that Aguilar fell right in our laps. if we had to start Merklinger this year it would have been a disaster and a totally different narrative.
2. will you still call Vandy a flash in the pan if they beat Tennessee?
3. and I'll reiterate my original point in the post I made. Tennessee's fatal flaw with their last 3 coaches is precisely the idea that we let it get to the point where the coach lost the team and the wheels came completely off the bus. The entire point is that we should never let that happen again.
Love the Dunning Kruger reference. It's spot on!Unfortunately, In today's society,shame and ignorance seem to be a badge of honor. It's seen as a flex when it used to be ridiculed and derided for the utter stupidity.
We,as a society, have lost the ability to tell stupid people they are stupid.
We're living in the age of dunning kruger
You cant expect to win big time football games if all 3 phases are not playing winning complementary football.Film Guy is pretty on target. He didn’t call TN a laughingstock but stated we were a 7-win team for two decades. Actually it was closer to 6.5 win team. TN finished unranked in the AP 14 times with a win percentage of .577, 139 against 102 losses. Finished below .500 nine seasons. That period was enough to knock TN out of the top 10 winningest programs, after playing since 1891.
Heupel has made the program respectable again and that is showing up in the 2025 and projected 2026 class. After overcoming a number of sanctions, administration at least as bad as the coaches installed, and one of the worst decades in Vol history. From 2011 - 2020, TN was a .500 team.
He could stand to square himself away and look more professional while he’s not winning championships. Also, you send a disjointed message to your team, especially the defense, when you clip your starting QBs for similar conduct you tolerate in Boo Carter; who knows how that has impacted D play aside from injuries and transfers. Overall, this was a better game from the D than we’ve seen in a while.
Either way, drive killing penalties for our offense and drive extending penalties for the opponent are still too frequent. Too many guys out of position and blowing assignments compound things, but then we are playing a lost of young guys and perhaps this pays off in 2026. Only coaches see the locker-room and Heupel will have to evaluated staff and player performance, making whatever changes are needed. Including his game time management.
And, this simply is new era due to NIL, profit-sharing, and portal, without comparison to even 5 years ago. TN is still no recruiting hot-bed despite not being the talent desert it was for so long. All three teams we’ve lost to have a higher 247 talent composite rating that TN; we rank 16, OU 14, and GA and AL are at 1 and 2. We have Mississippi level talent, not CA, FL, TX, GA, AL, LA level talent, so it’s a good thing we’ve not had to contend with multiple in-states schools for most. If Heupel can start stacking top 10 classes, we could be in for better things.
Plenty of valid criticisms but a plethora of plain, crazy-azz stuff from a handful who don’t seem to see the progress, or express impatience with it. The next level for Heupel is not a huge step but is at the incremental gains stage, where small improvements are purchased with discipline and fundamentals (assuming recruiting continues upward trend).
He’s 47. Coached nearly 100 games. He’s not really a young coach. The Oklahoma game on its own is frustrating… this isn’t about just the Oklahoma game. And I’m not saying that we need to fire him right now… in fact, I said the exact opposite if you actually read my post. I think we’re delaying the inevitable but I’m good with giving him another year. Next year will just be another slew of excuses though… tough schedule, potentially playing a freshman QB, etc., etc.Not dramatically at all.. At the pace Heupel is at, the only thing that would send this program back to 7-5 and 6-6 is our fans trying to prematurely get rid of a young football coach who is adapting by the year. For gods sake just have a little patience. The guy JUST got us out of 25 years of chaos and our fanbase just wants it back again like that. Before him we were in Nebraska territory. Meanwhile the guy STILL has recruiting restrictions from our past horrific coach that our fanbase insisted to hire. Be mad we lost the game, be mad we didn’t execute a game plan that dominated the game, and be mad at whatever else you want. But “taking a risk” and firing a coach that’s AHEAD of schedule coming from where he found us is just idiotic. Like brain dead. Truly.
He threw for almost 400yrds and 3 TD against OU, a top D in the SEC.I used to feel this way but now I suspect all these great passing numbers are due entirely to our extraordinarily weak schedule.
the pressure was turned up on this team 3 times this year and all four tires on the bus blew out in each of those attempts at facing down tougher teams.
being able to run up the score against cupcake OOC and bottom feeder SEC teams put a false narrative on the quality of the team which has now been completely exposed.
I don't like it but it's true and the thing is this opportunity to run up numbers is going away in the new SEC next year.
but I'm sure next year people will parrot " we are young and we have a new starting QB" etc etc. it's the same old thing here on Volnation. there's always conveniently an excuse for failure. just pick a new excuse out of the hat on your way through the door
Look. Here's my thing, I want Heupel to be the guy. I really do. In some ways we've seen him grow as a coach during his time here. He figured out how to win low scoring rock fight type games and has managed to knock off Florida and Bama. But at the same time, it's year 5 and it feels like we've hit our ceiling and we're just out of reach of where we want to be the way things are now. This off season will tell everything. If he rolls out next season with the exact same staff his days will be numbered. It's clear we could take that next step if Heupel is willing to shake up the staff, but the big question is will he be willing to make those changes. As for a replacement, I think they should get a CEO type head coach who can be a good leader and face of the program and will hire elite coordinators and assistant coaches to take care of the X's and O's. That's my opinion. We've been through both offensive and defensive guys and with both the opposite side of the ball suffers. Athletic directors and search committees make big bucks to find coaches. They should be able to find candidates who would fit the criteria I laid out. If it comes to replacing Heupel, we need a CEO head coach who will get elite coordinators and let them coachThat's not what he said.
Whether hes a Georgia Homer or not hes right.
These boneheads in this forum that are done with Heupel just want to cry and moan. Some have been asked who they'd hire to replace him and all Ive seen is "Me". Same BS with Butch. "My grandma could coach better, anyone would be better". What happened?
My point? They don't want to discuss it they just want to complain. Find one making a good case for a realistic replacement and Ill listen.
Some good programs out there looking for the next Saban. How many Sabans are there? Im not saying you cant fire Heupel, I wouldn't, but Im saying if you're gonna do it you better have a damn good plan and it seems nobody on this forum has one. Just fire him and throw a dart. Great plan.
