I'm not sure it's as different as you are attempting to imply. There are only 20-25 collegiate schools spending $200m on NIL (about 10 basketball teams spending $10M on roster construction last I looked). Essentially there are 20-30 collegiate teams working with similar "salary cap" figures in comparison to everyone else. UT Martin isn't going to be adding a high end transfer anytime soon...
Exactly this.... some folks don't research before they do their random math. Yes, there are 360+ div 1 basketball programs...300 of those don't have AD budgets over 20 mil much less enough money to spend 10 on basketball. I'll give you an example. UTC is an above average Div1 basketball program. They are not contenders to make the tourney but they represent the median. Their entire AD budget is 21mil. UTC is not a big school but its not a small one either.
Most of the school in the NCAA tourney have total Ad budgets well under what schools like UT spend on just recruiting.
Howard University 10mil
Akron 35 mil and only 11 of that comes from revenue.
Hofstra 25
Wright State 11
Miami (OH) 40
LIU 17
That's their total operating budgets for coaches, trainers, facilities etc
as
@VolatileVol said there are very few schools with money to even pay 1 million to a basketball player, much less 2+. There are schools in the SEC and big10 that can't afford it.
I think if people realised just how few college athletes are getting paid money like that, they'd be surprised.
Here is an example. My football team spent 20mil on players last year
Lets say I spent 3 mil on a QB 2 for a DE another 3 mil for 2 olinemen and 1 mil on a DB. Thats 9 mil for 5 players. I got 11 left.
11/80=137500 on average for the rest of the team. but wait roster is now 105, so I have on average 110k to give each of the rest of my players. So most of my players are making under 6 figures if they are getting anything.
Math is scary...