Dumbed Down History, v.1=Benedict Arnold

#1

JTrainDavis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2006
Messages
24,397
Likes
20
#1
I came up with this concept when browsing findagrave.com, and found that people were prohibited from posting memoriams on Benedict Arnold's page, due to a large amount of abusive posts.

Needless to say, i was pissed off. Those that simply call him a 'traitor' need to learn the facts, although the end result WAS Arnold betraying the young Nation, it surely pained him deeply to do so. General Arnold was an early supporter of American Independance, when the 'famous' types like John Adams, Washington, Francis Lee, et al, were initially in favor of reconciliation with the crown after April 19th, Arnold was leading Connecticut Militia to the outskirts of Boston to join the siege of Gage, Burgoyne, and others.

He played a major role in the expedition to take Ticonderoga, and bring the heavy guns there to Boston to aid the rebel cause.

Arnold came up with a bold plan to take the British Fortress of Quebec via an overland march through Maine, and despite total lack of supply, and many men lost to the bitter cold, held the City in check for 2 months, putting a big scare into the Royal forces in Canada.

After the withdrawel from Canada, he commanded a small navy on lake Champlain, delaying Burgoyne's movement down the river on the Rebel forts and Army.

After this, he successfully defended the Rebel supply base at Danbury, CT, and fought heroically at Saratoga, leading the army to Victory, while his superior officer, and an inferior commander, Gates, took credit.

For all Arnold gave the the nation, and the fact that he never got any credit in the reports, it is just sad to think that he WAS the best we had. Had Congress judged promotions by generalship rather than political connections, there is a good chance that Ben Arnold would have been out first President.

Sorry for the rant.
 
#2
#2
It'll be ok. People are dumb. Arnold got shafted at Ticonderoga (SP?). Although he betrayed a young America, people shouldn't criticize unless they know the whole story.

But we know that doesn't happen. So, Arnold is a name spat upon, is it wrong....no, but is it right, it's a matter of opinion. :hi:
 
#3
#3
Didn't he give the plans for the fort he was commanding (West Point) to the enemy? He may have been in internal turmoil, and other men of his era may have been for reconciliation, but when a military commander abandons his post and attempts to aid the enemy in conquering it, it is hard for me to see how American history, dumbed down or not, has judged him too harshly for labeling him a traitor.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top