Roustabout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 18,024
- Likes
- 15,398
It's become less of a crap shoot with the big recruit events such as The Opening, and all the camps. You can put a 4 star guy from Tennessee with a 4-star from Cali.Actually if you look at it every 3 star that is drafted in the first round is a big deal just from sheer numbers.
Reality is that scouting is a crapshoot and is even more of a crapshoot the further you go down the chain.
Scouting Active NFL players is easier because there are less variables in the mix. As you step down each level the variables increase exponentially and make it harder to scout in any real way. comparing a 4 star from TN to one from cali is a crapshoot because those 2 guys played in entirely different systems and environments.
The mere fact it (high school scouting) works as well as it does is kind of miraculous if you think about it.
Not even close.. try looking at the rankings for every player in the draft. Majority are not 4 and 5*'s
Just take a look at Alabuba. They consistently sign the top rated recruiting classes as far as star ranking goes, and they consistently have the most players drafted in the first two rounds.
4 and 5 stars are rated that high based primarily on athletic ability, not consistent play. And no, coaching cannot close such a talent gap. You may occasionally out coach and beat a better team, but over the long run you'll lose more than you win.
attached spreadsheet has entire draft with high school ratings. Notes in right column on the star numbers
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...MUKFCTHet7KwcErF_2dVllfQk/edit#gid=1943529355
Looking at the rivals site, they average around 33 5* ratings per year. Based on a quick review of the spreadsheet showing rankings of the draftees over the last few years, 5* recruits have a higher than 50% chance of getting drafted. That means that there is a greater than 50% chance of them translating those high school stars to the college level.
The shear volume of 4 and 3 stars was too much for me to waste my time with. Does anybody else have free time to calculate the probably of 4 or 3 stars going to the NFL?
That might be how you see it, but that's now how the people that actually generate these reports state a 3-star rating.
ESPN
Good prospects: 79-70 [Three stars]
These players show flashes of dominance, but not on a consistent basis -- especially when matched up against the top players in the country. Players closer to a 79 rating possess BCS-caliber ability and the potential to be a quality starter or all-conference player. Players closer to a 70 rating are likely non-BCS conference caliber prospects.
247
89-80 = Three-star prospect. These are the players who will develop into reliable starters for the college teams. They are among the best players in their region of the country, and are generally among the top 750 players in the nation.
If you are not developing your 3-star players into consistent performers, a-la the 4-star prospects, then still being at a 3-star-performance level, your NFL draft prospects are significantly lower. Coaching and development are not going to change the talent level, but they are going to refine it and improve consistency.
You ignored everything that didn't meet your agenda. And only one of those statements actually did.
Everything else mentioned was about talent. Even claiming they're inconsistent against top talent, goes back to "they're not as talented".
Curious as to the star ranking of Pro Bowl rosters (but not curious enough to actually do the work).
Derek Barnett 4 star 91 national ranking 206 drafted 14th
Alvin Kamara 4 star 97 NR 42 drafted 67
Cam Sutton 3 star 86 NR 576 drafted 94
Jalen Reeves-Maybin 4 star 90 NR 252 drafted 124
Josh Malone 4 star 98 NR 36 drafted 128
Josh Dobbs 4 star 92 NR 164 drafted 135
http://tennessee.247sports.com/Gall...dium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=170430_Tennessee Volunteers&utm_content=Link#
Because the majority of players are not 4 and 5 stars. Very few 5 stars are drafted because very few people are ranked as 5 stars
Good stuff..even though the 3 stars get their chance there is a huge money difference in going in the top 2 rounds.Looking at averages from the different rounds for 2017 draft from the spreadsheet posted earlier:
Round 1 - 3.5 stars
Round 2 - 3.13
Round 3 - 2.7
Round 4 - 2.84
Round 5 - 2.58
Round 6 - 2.32
Round 7 - 2.43
It appears after the first 2 rounds stars from high school do not matter anymore. I would say based on this, 3* players can be developed into good NFL prospects obviously with the right attitude and coaching.
One note, Alabama had 4 - 5* players drafted in the first round. The average in the first round would have been closer to 3 if they were taken out of the equation. That's the problem we face playing Alabama, the team is always littered with first and second round talent.