Dose of Reality

#1
Dagreek1998

Dagreek1998

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
381
Likes
22
#1
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4
#4
Cool, and when you're finished installing the revolving door at the coach's office, who you gonna get to walk through it?

<Non "Dool-Head", just a realist.
 
#5
#5
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...

I usually don't ignore people, but you will be my first. Idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#6
#6
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...

red_blue_pill.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
I wasn't aware that trolling = reality.


2/10 attempt. I gave you 1 extra point because the rushing statistics are viable, but not enough to send Dooley packing next year. Someone will take the bait, but its going to be someone who's not bright.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8
#8
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...

:crazy:
 
#12
#12
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing
game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards
per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per
carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC
teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt
or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...


Get a life moron and get off the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13
#13
I've not been thrilled with a lot of the issues on the offensive side of the ball either, some personnel related and yes some coaching/scheme related.

However, if we get rid of Dooley now, we'd be lucky to hire a high scool coach and would be back to where we were a few years ago. I think we have to give him 1-2 more years regardless of the job he does just to stabilize the program.
 
#14
#14
mcompton said:
My ignore button has really gotten a workout these couple of weeks...
Click to expand...

I went on a ignore rampage last night. I don't know why I waited so long. Now I will make this abortion of a thread and *******d poster dissapear. Bye bye.:stinker2:
 
#16
#16
VolDC said:
He was my first also.:) You never forget your first.
Click to expand...


Thats funny, it gave me a laugh.

I know you may not like my point and think I am an idiot. My biggest fear is that we spend two more years going through this only to find out that Dooley is in over his head. Then, we will be screwed.

The reason I fear this is becasue the O-Line is where every great team begins. This is almost two entire seasons in the program for 4 of the 5 starters. and most of the reserves. That means the same coaches, gameplans, and drills. After 23 games, our line is still horrible. We cannot establish the run against even the weak woodshed teams on our schedule. If they have this little improvement after 23 games, do you really think they will be great in another 12 games.

Go ahead and call it trolling and laugh at me, but deep inside, there is a little voice that is saying the same thing. :hi:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#17
#17
Dagreek1998 said:
Thats funny, it gave me a laugh.

I know you may not like my point and think I am an idiot. My biggest fear is that we spend two more years going through this only to find out that Dooley is in over his head. Then, we will be screwed.

Go ahead and call it trolling and laugh at me, but deep inside, there is a little voice that is saying the same thing. :hi:
Click to expand...

No. We will be screwed if we have another coach in 2012.

That is all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#21
#21
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...





:no:
 
#22
#22
Dagreek1998 said:
Hey DOOL-HEADS, its that time again. IT'S REALITY TIME and I your host.

Topic: Offensive Line (Running Game vs Non-SEC Teams)

Excuse 1: We are young
Excuse 2: We dont have any talent
Excuse 3: We have no depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

Counterpoint:

Against Montana: 46 carries for 128 yards, 2.8 yds per carry. (Montana averaged 3.7 yards per carry)

Against Cincinnati: 35 carries for 126 yards, 3.6 yards per carry. (Cincinnati averaged 6.4 yards per carry)

(After Justin Hunter Injury)

Against Buffalo: 44 carries for 199 yards, 4.5 yards per carry (Buffalo averaged 5.3 yards per carry)

(After Tyler Bray Injury)

Against Middle Tennessee: 45 carries for 120 yards, 2.7 yards per carry (MTSU averaged 4.6 yards per carry)

Now, my point is simple. The most basic princple in football is the ability to run the football. Based on the factual information above, Tennessee has failed to do this against even non-SEC teams.

170 carries for 573 yards, 3.3 yards per carry

So DOOL-HEAD, is your arguement really going to be that we have

Excuse 1: We are younger
Excuse 2: We have less talent
Excuse 3: We have less depth
Excuse 4: Injuries have hurt the passing game

than these teams???? REALLY, I think we can agree that a change to the O-Line and RB coaches is needed. The head coach can stay, oh yeah, he coaches the running backs. :birgits_giggle:

Everyone says theat he needs time to compete against the SEC, it is year two and he has yet establish the run on non-SEC teams. If this is the case and a strong running game is critical to winning in the SEC, how many years is it until we can establish the run against SEC teams. Remember, these linemen will be gone in 2 seasons and it may take them that long to average 4 to 5 yards a carry against Sunbelt or Division II teams.

Oh and before someone brings up the 111 yards against LSU, heres a breakdown on the rushing totals against SEC teams

168 carries for 347 yards, 2.1 yards per carry

3.3 against non-SEC teams
2.1 against SEC teams

Spin that DOOL-HEADS, let me guess, its time to piss the bed to stay warm. Got to keep him for another year that way we dont hit rock bottom. :eek:lol:

WAKE UP. This is the offical kick-off of my new campaign

NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
NO YEAR THREE FOR DOOLEY
Click to expand...


Umm just so you know 3 of the 4 are not exscuse they are FACTS.
 
#24
#24
VolFan37323 said:
Umm just so you know 3 of the 4 are not exscuse they are FACTS.
Click to expand...

They become excuses when people use them to justify poor performance. Winners find ways, no excuses. And the poor performance I am calling out is against Montana, Cincinnati, Buffalo, and MTSU. Do we really need to find excuses for those teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#25
#25
Dagreek1998 said:
They become excuses when people use them to justify poor performance. Winners find ways, no excuses. And the poor performance I am calling out is against Montana, Cincinnati, Buffalo, and MTSU. Do we really need to find excuses for those teams.
Click to expand...

no excuses, we won

(reluctantly included you in 'we' but feel free to correct my assumption)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top