Dooley = Organized

#1

Tenacious D

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
3,336
Likes
1
#1
I thought this was his strong suit.

Well, he just made Les Miles' (LES MILES) game management look like Sun Tzu.

This is akin to Fulmer beating you in a foot race, only more embarrassing.
 
#2
#2
Last week we were playing with 10 men on the field this week we were playing with 13 men on the field
 
#3
#3
Is it Dooley or Wilcox's responsibility to get the players on and off the field.

I have NEVER heard of a head coach being in charge of getting personel on and off.
 
#4
#4
It is scary to think about the shape this program will be in when he finally gets fired in 2 or 3 years.
 
#7
#7
I thought this was his strong suit.

Well, he just made Les Miles' (LES MILES) game management look like Sun Tzu.

This is akin to Fulmer beating you in a foot race, only more embarrassing.

the irony here is that if LSU was actually half organized then we wouldn't have had time for multiple sets of subs.
 
#10
#10
So you are saying that Wilcox asked Dooley if they should sub? Stupid, if so. It was Wilcox's decision.

Gee. I seem to remember this **** happening multiple times last week, including the last defensive play of the game. Seems the head man ought to remind Wilcox to get that straight.
 
#12
#12
no he's saying they should be prepared for this.

it trickles down from the top.

two consecutive weeks we have not been able to substitute correctly, UAB , we didnt get enough guys on the field several times, this week, we get too many out there and lose.

Not very promising.

"earning the players trust"

when does it start?
 
#13
#13
It is scary to think about the shape this program will be in when he finally gets fired in 2 or 3 years.

"Super-good" doesn't seem to be a viable descriptor, so I'll predict we'll use the term, "classy, we--organized, lovable losers" when describing the opening to head coaching candidates in 2-3 years.

If he loses to Kenlucky, he's done in three years.

If Vandy or Memphis, it's two.
 
#14
#14
Fulmer did this after being a head coach for 16 years.

Dooleys been a head coach for 3 years and his 1st in the SEC.

A little premature
 
#16
#16
New coaches, young players......

Tennessee and Dooley will be scary GOOD in a couple years.

Dooley and Company have to grow and its things like this that will make that happen.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#17
#17
This one is on Wilcox and the Defensive staff IMO. This makes 2 weeks in a row that we have had personnel issues. 3rd and Chavis has become 3rd and Wilcox. We gave up 2 3rd and longs and a 4th and long on the final drive ti an offense with absolutely zero passing game. INEXCUSABLE. Based on the evidence to this point in the season, Wilcox is in way over his head. Players played their guts out and were let down by their coaches. I don't give a rat's behind what you think about this post or me. It's the truth. Gonna be a long cold winter if the coaches don't step it up. The players did their part today. Shouldn't they expect their leaders to do the same? This has been total incompetence on the defensive staff to this point.
On the bright side our debt to karma should be paid in full. This evens us up for the '98 Stoerner fumble. Maybe something good can come our way now.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#18
#18
The point is Dooley is ultimately responsible and should take 100% of the onus for this.

I think he will, just like he did last week.

That doesn't seem to have meant - or helped - very much at all. I don't care if he takes responsibility or not - it's pinned on him, regardless.

What's most troubling is that he seems incapable of correcting this, the most elementary of mistakes (who doesn't know that you can only have 11 men?), and it not only fumbled away a GIGANTIC step forward for this team and the entire program, but somehow managed to sink to a depth not previously thought possible.

Losing a game you should have won, one the road, against a Top 10 opponent, in an SEC game......because you can't count....how do the Dooley-lovers spin this one? I'm sure they will, but it'll be interesting to see how they do it.

You can continue believing that so many lesser nonsenses will change that fact - you know, like saying you just need to shake your pom-poms harder, or touting things like Dooley's "character" or "he's from the South" or "he really believes the maxims" or (my favorite) "Saban really respects him"- but they won't.

Dooley might be a good guy, and he may turn out to be the next Saban, after all - but he is about 10 years shy of the experience required for the position he holds. Dooley is in over his head, and most simply got a swig of that truth today, albeith a particularly painful one. For those who continue to tell themselves, "It can't get any worse".

It can, it has, and it will continue to do so until we get the coach we deserve.
 
#19
#19
Actually it's the players who came in the game that are supposed to make sure the other players get off the field. Yea we might not have needed to sub at that time but its the players responsibility to get who they are replacing off the field
 
#20
#20
Gee. I seem to remember this **** happening multiple times last week, including the last defensive play of the game. Seems the head man ought to remind Wilcox to get that straight.

Exactly... last week we couldn't get enough players on the field. This week we have too many.

This is not difficult.
 
#22
#22
This one is on Wilcox and the Defensive staff IMO. This makes 2 weeks in a row that we have had personnel issues. 3rd and Chavis has become 3rd and Wilcox. We gave up 2 3rd and longs and a 4th and long on the final drive ti an offense with absolutely zero passing game. INEXCUSABLE. Based on the evidence to this point in the season, Wilcox is in way over his head. Players played their guts out and were let down by their coaches. I don't give a rat's behind what you think about this post or me. It's the truth. Gonna be a long cold winter if the coaches don't step it up. The players did their part today. Shouldn't they expect their leaders to do the same? This has been total incompetence on the defensive staff to this point.
On the bright side our debt to karma should be paid in full. This evens us up for the '98 Stoerner fumble. Maybe something good can come our way now.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

After last week and this week I agree with this above. Also, I'm starting to wonder about Chaney's playcalling. I was able to guess about 2/3 of Chaney's calls which is scary since I am in no way an expert/coach etc. Playcalling seems to be very Randy Sanders like and very predictable. Not 1 freakin HB/FB pass at all tonight and only 2 or 3 throws to the TE.
 
#23
#23
It is scary to think about the shape this program will be in when he finally gets fired in 2 or 3 years.

This is why I started a thread about mediocrity last spring. This looks like an 8 or 9 win staff in the third year that will never rise beyond that.

Two to three years is the best case.
 
#24
#24
Exactly... last week we couldn't get enough players on the field. This week we have too many.

This is not difficult.

Ah...I get it. The coaching staff over corrected. Maybe they should buy another dry erase board and get this thing fixed!
 
#25
#25
Actually it's the players who came in the game that are supposed to make sure the other players get off the field. Yea we might not have needed to sub at that time but its the players responsibility to get who they are replacing off the field

This is partly true because its also the coaches job to be watching for that when you set new personal packages into the game. Secondly when a team make mistakes one week you get that fixed for next week and further games. Dooley obviously forgot to work on that problem. WOW!
 

VN Store



Back
Top