Does AU get docked for turning down bowl?

#27
#27
I
The biggest benefit that they lose is the additional 15 or so days of practice - and with a new coach/system. At least they can get acclimated to how the new coach runs the practice sessions which now they have to use some spring sessions to learn. cant think of a
I cant think of an example when the new coach coached in the bowl game instead of the interim.
 
#32
#32
looked for this question everywhere! Right forum?

If they turned down money to go into the conference pool do they get a full share of the money from the rest that did create the pool? Does not seem right.

Thanks in advance…..

Don't believe the SEC has a position on penalizing schools for not going to a bowl.

SEC revenue distribution is generated by a pool of money going to the SEC from Bowl games, college football playoff, SEC Football Championship game, SEC basketball tournament , TV revenue and any other NCAA championships that school participate in. Split is equal to all conference members.
 
#33
#33
Please tell me when they ever were "relevant". Tell me a time when the Music City Bowl meant anything more than it does now.

This pearl clutching over the bowls is beyond hilarious to me because the bowls haven't changed one bit, it's just people are just now realizing that they never meant anything all along. Literally the only thng that has changed is people's perspectives. The bowls and their value have changed ZIP.

This is like people freaking out realizing that *GASP*.....the NIT doesn't really matter much!

Edit: This wasn't directed at you, just I'm seeing this reaction a lot around here and it's just really puzzling to me.

A fair point. I suppose maybe it’s just a “feels like” kind of thing. A bowl game felt like it could add momentum to the off season or maybe leave a bad sour taste until the next year’s kick-off. In reality, it probably didn’t matter much practically, as you say.
 
#36
#36
What a world we’ve ended up in nowadays!

The expanded playoffs have largely rendered the rest of the post-season bowls irrelevant. Players were already starting to opt out before that, but now we have schools actually choosing to decline invitations.

Conference championship games are on their way to becoming just an annoyance for the teams involved except in very specific circumstances.

Programs have to re-recruit their rosters every off-season as other schools try to lure their best players away with bigger NIL offers.

Some players get a big NIL deal and then try to hold their programs hostage by demanding more even when their on-field performance doesn’t warrant a “raise.” All the while, these guys are pimping themselves to other programs to see if they can get more $.

Coaches have always (mostly) been $ wh%res, not that different from politicians - but now so many of us rush to make excuses for garbage like Lane Kiffin. Heck, it looks like Dan Campbell ran out on his players without even talking to them.

This is the new world we’ve made. It’s daunting to think where the sport is headed. I hope we figure out how to stabilize things a bit in the next year or two.

You mean Matt Campbell from Iowa St., Detroit fans love Dan Campbell they would have all the interstates blocked and the airport fenced off if Dan Campbell tried to leave. He wouldn't make it!!
 
#38
#38
Please tell me when they ever were "relevant". Tell me a time when the Music City Bowl meant anything more than it does now.

This pearl clutching over the bowls is beyond hilarious to me because the bowls haven't changed one bit, it's just people are just now realizing that they never meant anything all along. Literally the only thng that has changed is people's perspectives. The bowls and their value have changed ZIP.

This is like people freaking out realizing that *GASP*.....the NIT doesn't really matter much!

Edit: This wasn't directed at you, just I'm seeing this reaction a lot around here and it's just really puzzling to me.
This^^^ The Music City Bowl still has the same meaning it did 5 years ago.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top