Volatility
Clown World.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2010
- Messages
- 2,235
- Likes
- 3,682
Please correct me if I am wrong, but the UT offense (CBJ offense) has many of the characteristics Houston and Ohio State offenses. They are doing pretty well, so the scheme is not the major issue, but execution (back to personnel and coaching)
For the comments on crisp execution of game plans. You are right, it has been a long time since we just took care of business on every game. Maybe back to the Shuler days. Even with Peyton and Clausen, we would get into fights with smaller squads.
Because that coach started doing same thing... losing to teams like Wyoming.
Just bad leadership from top (AD, Chancellor, etc.) did not handle it well in all aspects, including the coaches they hired after. In fact, I believe leadership, or lack there of may have been more of the problem then Fulmer.
You are using Ohio State, Houston and Tennessee in the same scenario. Do you not realize the huge difference in all of those teams? Please do not compare us to Houston or OSU. We are not even in their league.
You really can't think we are good 3 - 0 scrapping by against bottom feeders can you? Our offense is terrible, predictable, and ineffective.
Out with Deboring. So many good OC's out there. Just watch other games
His scheme sucks and the goons he has running it make it worse.
It's gimmicky at its most effective and disastrous most other times.
Here's what I don't understand...they had Malone in a 1-on-1, press coverage situation multiple times in this game, routinely slowed down at the line of scrimmage and changed the play, and took a shot down the field to him once.
Does DeBord see that and think "oh, they've got Malone in press man coverage, so we can't throw to him?" Does he not think that his guys can win 1-on-1 battles against Ohio corners?