Good. Fox has largely ceased to be a news organization and are now, essentially, state media, as noted in the New Yorker article. Political bias/perspective is endemic in journalism, always has been. Fox, CNN, NBC, etc. have all had their slants, but they were apparent and still capable of asking questions of candidates from both sides. The way Fox, though, has ingratiated itself with this White House, having its members make daily conference calls and meetings with the president, helping formulate policy while then having a nightly show to comment on those policies is crossing a line.
Trying to badmouth the only Republican News TV station while not mentioning the 20 that are a 100 times worth that get their talking points faxed from Pelosi is laughable.Except that it's true. The way the Fox News media has become part of the policy making, or discussing, team is completely unprecedented and the closest to state run, or influenced, media we've ever had. I will amend my "good" with a notation for one of the few objective journalists at Fox to moderate a debate, like Shepherd Smith or Chris Wallace, especially since it probably would be Wallace doing it.
Except that it's true. The way the Fox News media has become part of the policy making, or discussing, team is completely unprecedented and the closest to state run, or influenced, media we've ever had. I will amend my "good" with a notation for one of the few objective journalists at Fox to moderate a debate, like Shepherd Smith or Chris Wallace, especially since it probably would be Wallace doing it.