You lost a big clump of us in the "we can all agree to that" camp when you ended with 10 to 12 mins PT:salute:Here is the end-all to the Dane debate:
Dane Bradshaw is a solid contributor on a team, due to past coaches' doing, is being forced into a more major role than his talent is capable of dealing with. We all love his tenacity, heart, and ability to play unselfishly. However, through no fault of his own or from Bruce Pearl, he is being counted for mounting, precious minutes that in 2-3 seasons, he wouldn't have if he were here. As much as CBP loves Bradshaw, he knows Dane's scoring ineffeciencies hinder this team. Yes, he dishes out 4.9 assists per game, and this is a great thing he does. However, many other weaknesses in his game do slow down the team. Pearl has to play Dane, as the cupboards weren't stocked when he took over. Dane is a perfect 10-12min/game guy who comes off the bench as a wildfire.
I think we can all agree with this.
.....smart guy....knows the game:thumbsup:Another great game by the Lame Dane. 1-4, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 POINTS!!!Nobody played their best game, but this guy has got to be benched! He's just plain terrible game in game out. Give someone else a shot. I'd rather see Crews, Tabb, and I can't believe I'm saying this but Childress get the start over Dane.
I'm a somewhat slow guy, but I think he's also putting down Crews et. al.?????:blink:Another great game by the Lame Dane. 1-4, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 POINTS!!!Nobody played their best game, but this guy has got to be benched! He's just plain terrible game in game out. Give someone else a shot. I'd rather see Crews, Tabb, and I can't believe I'm saying this but Childress get the start over Dane.
Yeah, I know....I think I'll just back off and leave this to you "Rupps" to hash out.Nothing like a lengthy series of short meaningless posts by the same person, in a conversation with only himself.