Still, it's not reality to suggest we're anywhere near better off rolling the dice, as we are, with Aguilar or Merk.
While Nico wasn't the star of last year's team, he was a significant cog on a team that made the CFP.
Had Nico NOT showed his butt and left, we'd all be fine and hopeful that with our other improvements we'd be in the running to go back to the CFP. Would Nico have gotten better? Many do and many don't, as you say. The team should be better so even a "same mid performance as last year" Nico would not have been a bad UT team.
The question for UT is will Aguilar get ready because the SunBelt is long way from the SEC.
I get it that people want to spin "we're okay" from this and hopefully we are but the tendency to deny that a seasoned Nico wouldn't be a very decent asset to go with our other improvements is just not looking at reality. He would've been a great asset with strong receivers, a stronger line, etc especially because of his SEC experience and specifically his experience in Heupel's offense.
It's just the reality. Losing your starter after Spring practice is not good. Losing your starter who is in various conversations as potentially one of the better 2026 QBs in the NFL draft is not good.