Crompton better than Stafford?

#126
#126
VolsRule said:
So far, from reading all these posts, it seems that the bad offense was not the fault of:

1. Clawson (fulmer was telling him what to do, what play to run, etc.)
2. Crompton (he had a bad oline)
3. The oline (Fulmer didn't hire a good oline coach)
4. Drayton (UT's oline didn't give the RBs any holes)
5. RBs (see bad oline)
6. The receivers (see bad running game)

In conclusion, the terrible offense is not due to anyone on UT's staff: it resulted from some unknown force--perhaps it could be the subject of a future X-Files movie!
Click to expand...

1. Clawson (fulmer was telling him what to do, what play to run, etc.)- uh no that is total BS - when Fulmer was OC, we didn't sux (differn't time ok,...so just settle down ya'll)
2. Crompton (he had a bad oline) NO, had a BAD Off. Coord.
3. The oline (Fulmer didn't hire a good oline coach) .....???
4. Drayton (UT's oline didn't give the RBs any holes) see No.1
5. RBs (see bad oline)see No.1

6. The receivers (see bad running game)see No.1
 
#128
#128
Nobody thought Crompton would be as bad as he is, I mean if you had told me Crompton was going to be one of the worst quarterbacks in college football and Tennesse history, I would have said you were crazy.

Stafford has a big arm period. He has potential yes, but he makes poor decisions with the football. Ainge made some seriously bad decisions with the football too but Cut fixed him, so I think Stafford can get fixed, but no way I'd take him as my first pick in the draft.
 
#130
#130
The whole thing was a question of the center-to-quarterback snap; he ACTUALLY HAD to send it back to Crompton. Without that, it could have been fixed.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top