Couple of questions for those watching from home

[DaddyChad]

1) The FG miss. Was the hold good or anything else off or was it just a miss?

2)The OU run back for a touchdown. It looked like he stepped out of bounds on the big screen in stadium. Should’ve been reviewed it seemed like or Heupel should’ve took a timeout as well.

 

[TennesseeTarheel]

I think the hold wàs good. I thought Max was flustered.
I think the player's foot was 1mm shy of being out. Too close too overturn. Just my opinion.

 

[cherokeeeVOL]

It looked like just a miss. For the run back he barely stayed in bounds. All in all it was one of the most frustrating games to watch IMO since this staff has been here.

 

[Clad in Big Orange]

On the Star Thomas run, there was no way "indisputable" evidence was seen on the replay. That play shouldn't have been overturned regardless of how it was called on the field. I think he planted the inside most part of his left foot in bounds and what they "thought" they saw was the outside edge of his foot barely on the white line. The outside part of the foot was likely angled such that it wasn't touching the ground. All this to say, you can't overturn the call made on the field.

 

[ochocinco]

On the Star Thomas run, there was no way "indisputable" evidence was seen on the replay. That play shouldn't have been overturned regardless of how it was called on the field. I think he planted the inside most part of his left foot in bounds and what they "thought" they saw was the outside edge of his foot barely on the white line. The outside part of the foot was likely angled such that it wasn't touching the ground. All this to say, you can't overturn the call made on the field.

Yup. Thats first thing I thought of too. You can’t be 100% sure his foot touched any white line. The announcers were acting all shocked but the reason it took so long for review is because they were desperately trying to find a way to call him out of bounds. That could have changed everything.

 

[savannahfan]

It looked like just a miss. For the run back he barely stayed in bounds. All in all it was one of the most frustrating games to watch IMO since this staff has been here.

I think the problem with the kick came from bad timing. The snap was a little wide and took a split second to get it down. I kicking foot looked to me to get there just a little off time. Maybe kicker saw it and flinched. Either way the timing looked off to me.

 

[OrangeBeachVol]

Looked to me like he just hooked the attempt. Having never tried that sport, not sure what causes that from kickers. Maybe got my answer above.
But that is 2 critical misses from him this season. Understand missing some but got to make the ones you got to make.

 

[Ned Ray McWorkher]

1) The FG miss. Was the hold good or anything else off or was it just a miss?

2)The OU run back for a touchdown. It looked like he stepped out of bounds on the big screen in stadium. Should’ve been reviewed it seemed like or Heupel should’ve took a timeout as well.

1) Botched field goal attempt. Simple.

2) Replay showed he didn't step out. TD. Just like at Bama.

 

[GoVols64]

On the Star Thomas run, there was no way "indisputable" evidence was seen on the replay. That play shouldn't have been overturned regardless of how it was called on the field. I think he planted the inside most part of his left foot in bounds and what they "thought" they saw was the outside edge of his foot barely on the white line. The outside part of the foot was likely angled such that it wasn't touching the ground. All this to say, you can't overturn the call made on the field.

I'm 100% with you on this. It was as close as it gets but they should have stuck with the call on the field.