Charleston is a decent team, probably in the neighborhood of Oakland or VCU. All their losses have been close, and all to good teams.
OTOH, they don't really have any good wins. The way things are going, if you're Charleston you have to believe you can steal your first big win at Tennessee on Friday.
They're an experienced team. Just looking at total minutes and not checking every box score, they appear to start 4 seniors.
They're a team with decent size for a mid-major, starting 6-2, 6-3, 6-7, 6-8, 6-8. Actually this might be perfect from Tennessee's perspective: no pesky 5-11 guards snapping at Hopson and Tatum, but also not quite enough size to handle Tobias and Brian in the paint. I like the height range very much.
No depth--they play 7 guys.
Their offense is good. They're above-average on the offensive glass. No one player gets tons of offensive rebounds, but it looks like all those medium-tall guys fly around in there and try to grab some.
Their calling card, though, is making 2-pointers. They shoot the 2 at 55%, good enough for 18th in the country. When a team shoots that well from 2, it tends to mean they're well-coached and getting good shots. 6-2 senior Goudelock is leading them in 2-point attempts, and is shooting them at 55%, so he's carrying their high percentage. He also happens to be leading them in 3-point percentage, and is the shortest guy on the starting team; this leads me to guess they're good from 2 not because of coaching, but because he's beating his man and converting in the paint. But who knows.
The other guy to watch appears to be 6-8 senior Jeremy Simmons, shooting a robust 63% from 2. He's also probably their best offensive rebounder and is leading in FT attempts, so he's doing his damage inside.
The other guys don't shoot it as frequently or as accurately. 6-8 freshman Trent Wiedeman bears watching, though. He's only attempted 41 2-pt FG's the whole year, but he's hit 71% of them and made it to the line 42 times. He appears to be a very efficient player who doesn't yet have a huge part in the offense.
Defensively, they're not very good. They don't foul, and that's their one good statistic on defense. They don't turn teams over, and they allow a halfway decent percentage from 2 and 3. They don't appear to be a stifling half-court D at all.
Bad for them: they're one of the worst teams in college hoops at defensive rebounding, ranked 288th in defensive rebounding percentage. Tennessee is 17th in offensive rebounding percentage, so this is strength vs. weakness.
All in all, it's a good matchup for Tennessee on paper. Goins should, in theory, be able to handle Goudelock. Tobias, Brian, and any other post we trot out there should be able to keep their collection of 6-8-ers in check. We tend to draw a lot of fouls, and that's bad for Charleston because they don't have any depth.
We should destroy them on our offensive glass.
But with all that said--who knows? Tennessee this year is hard to figure.
If I had to predict, I'd say we roll them. Tennessee needs a bounce-back game badly, and this is a solid team that seems to be tailor-made to play to our strengths.
Sorry for the length.