VolMarine1371
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
- Messages
- 4,603
- Likes
- 8,368
Eventually history becomes recent history... if not, Yale is a powerhouse budWhen I talk about history I think about the entire history not cherry picking to try to prove a false narrative. History is that Ut and Alabama has the most wins in the SEC in history snd also UT is 2nd in Nattys and conference champs in history of the SEC. I don’t believe it said the last 30 years. Because if it was only the last 30 years then UT most definitely don’t get in.
Yeah, we are much stronger than UGA before 1970, they are much stronger since.
1869-1969
14. Tennessee, 449-191
28. Georgia, 397-250
1970-2020
7. Georgia, 442-177
18. Tennessee, 400-211
In the AP poll era, we were better than them in the 1930's, 1950's, 1960's, and 1990's. They were better than us in the 1940's, 1970's, 1980's, 2000's and 2010's. Regardless, without slicing and dicing it, in the entire history of CFB, we have 10 more wins than they do.
I would if they are simply basing this on "blue blood" programs. I've seen others that are just basing some of the teams on these lists off of recent success.
Harvard, Yale and Penn don't count anymore because they aren't FBS anymore. That's pretty simple.What's your definition of "blue blood" programs? What do you think a coaches poll would look like? UGA is the third-winningest program in the SEC, only 10 games behind UT, and catching up quickly. Do we count since the beginning or modern era? If we go from the beginning, Harvard, Yale and Penn are ahead of Tennessee and UGA.
Would LSU football be in a college football ‘Super League’?
We made the cut....
The No-Brainers
These programs deserve a spot, based on their history
- Alabama Crimson Tide
- Clemson Tigers
- LSU Tigers
- Oklahoma Sooners
- Ohio State Buckeyes
- Georgia Bulldogs
- Florida Gators
- Notre Dame Fighting Irish
- USC Trojans
- Miami Hurricanes
- Auburn Tigers
- Tennessee Volunteers
- Michigan Wolverines
- Texas Longhorns
- Nebraska Cornhuskers
If a team is not a member of FBS anymore, I think it's pretty obvious why they wouldn't be counted in a list of all-time winningest FBS teams. In any event, the Ivy League left Division 1-A (the immediate predecessor to FBS) in 1983. That's 38 years ago, any wins they have accumulated against each other that time are not FBS wins, so their actual number of FBS wins is in fact lower than Tennessee and Georgia too for that matter. I'm not sure why this is controversial or a hard to understand distinction.So we're using "historical", but only in certain circumstances?
If a team is not a member of FBS anymore, I think it's pretty obvious why they wouldn't be counted in a list of all-time winningest FBS teams. In any event, the Ivy League left Division 1-A (the immediate predecessor to FBS) in 1983. That's 38 years ago, any wins they have accumulated against each other that time are not FBS wins, so their actual number of FBS wins is in fact lower than Tennessee and Georgia too for that matter. I'm not sure why this is controversial or a hard to understand distinction.
Every team on every published list that I have seen is FBS. Try again.Didn't see where this fictitious league description said anything about FBS teams. Maybe I scanned over it. In any event, if we're not counting history we shouldn't count history. Anyone in their right mind would take a recent sampling of, say, the present century, which is now over 20 years old. 20 years is plenty of sample time to ascertain which programs are top tier.
That list of 15 would include:
Boise State
Texas
Oklahoma
Ohio State
Southern California
Florida
TCU
LSU
Georgia
Virginia Tech
Miami (FL)
Utah
Oregon
Auburn
West Virginia